Random
-
Posts
1137 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Random
-
-
Have to show my support for DCS:Rocket. I could use some more contempories, at least in AI, for the GCI role, but a late one is quite adaptable.
Mods and scripts make the module work. It has unique... being mach2 and able to intercept a concorde is something interesting but it takes some work from the mission designer.
Hmmm. AI Concorde and an AI U2 necessary! I imagine recreating the U2 intercept and surviving ought to be a challenge.
-
so now the mig 21 gets a play mate im so going to ad the lightning to my hanger when its out
To be honest, the Mig 19 is the one I'd match up against the lightning. Give it a real run for its money as the 19 has an even better thrust to weight ratio. Although it doenst have the outright performance, in a knife fight that thrust to weight ratio will be a big help!
-
I never got to see one fly IRL. Would have loved to.
-
Give over, its a F.53 we want with ground attack ;)
I have the pilot's notes and the operating data and handling manual for the F.53 … T.55 P1A P1B F.1 F.1A F.2 F.3 F.6 T.Mk.4 T.Mk.5 :D
Plus a few others.
:P :pilotfly:
Do the export versions have the datalink and Computer Red though?
Not that datalink was ever used operationally it's still rather cool. I'd LOVE to do a datalinked GCI in DCS
-
I'd favour an F.6
Mainly because I have pilots notes, manuals etc for the F.6
-
I use the same joystick I use for flying.
I could do with a LANTIRN stick though!
-
Simply click em with the mouse!
-
Set the axis as a slider. Invert as necessary.
Also it sounds like you may not have unlocked the throttles before trying to move them.
-
How about the F-104? It was built in much larger numbers and was used in significantly more air forces than the rather exotic Lightning.
Absolutely would love an F104. One if the early ones with the downward ejection please.
I have a thing for manned missiles! F104, Mig 21, Lightning etc
Not related to your post norbot but I'm always puzzled by some people's hostility towards any suggestion for a module that is't one they personally like.
My attitude: if the data is available and a developer wants to do it it would be a welcome addition. If it's something a bit odd and flawed all the better.
-
Pretty sure the Lightning Preservation Group would be eager to help... live aircraft too so think of all those lovely authentic sounds that could be recorded!
-
Had the chance to sit in a F.6 at bruntinthorpe. Friend of mine helps look after them and was talking me through how everything worked. Its certainly rather cosy!
Im terrified of heights and ladders yet I somehow got up and in. Coming down was less easy!
-
Hmmm maybe we need a Vulcan....
Falklands map is in development after all.
-
again though the real king of these contests is the F-4, which - if I'm reading the charts right (p. 382) - can keep pace with the earlier Lightnings even with 4xAIM-7's on the pylons. Once it's burned some fuel, at least.
Around 3 minutes 30 seconds for an F.6 (slower than an F.3) to accelerate from M.1 to M.2 at 35k feet according to alicatt's charts.
The Phantom charts are hard for me to make sense of. But at 35k feet it looks like its about 30 seconds slower if you start at 38k lbs and 3 MINUTES slower if you start at 50k lbs!
-
Would sell my firstborn for a Lightning in DCS
(note I have no children so its an easy claim to make)
-
Absolutely would love a Lightning in DCS. And F.6 my favourite jet by far!
I can't see it happening though. No RWR, very much a one trick pony (unless an export version was modelled)
-
-
Ive been having this issue... Assumed it was my PC!
-
As an experiment as RIO I had the radar on while my pilot was practicing carrier landings. I got a return in pulse mode. Initial thought was it must be the carrier! Locked the contact and landed... other friend who was in another aircraft on the carrier started taxiing to the catapult and I got a bearing change following him.
So the radar could see him but not the carrier which I dont believe is realistic behaviour.
Will attempt to replicate and post a track when I have spare time.
-
I think its more than pixel size. I think contrast between adjacent pixels is extremely important too.
Id love to test my theory but haven't got anything like the funds to do so.
-
Not once pulled the wings off myself. Smooth inputs and ride the buffet.
Remember blacking out takes sustained G. If you try to use the screen darkening around the edges as your over G indication you are going to be pulling well past the G limit before getting your queue to ease off.
-
First thing I checked. No change even though its in the changelog!
-
Yep this is an annoying one! Often causes me to drop a contact as RIO
-
1070 will be fine. If framerate is a bit low the first things I'd turn down are shadows. They seem to have a big impact for me on a 780ti in 4k.
-
Looking forward to seeing the fix in game! Though I've more or less mastered refuelling with the probe somewhere over my shoulder!
ee lightning?
in RAZBAM
Posted
Going to have to get myself a VR headset for AAR. Several friends say its a hell of a lot easier! Lightning's AAR Probe being a couple of feet to your left will make stuff more interesing too!