Rafal

How can I enable MPCD's export so I wont have to use keybindings every time I start new mission? It's bit annoying.

Another 'meaningful' statement. Aren't they happy now? Should I tell a joke to make them happy? -Knock, knock. -Who's there? -Bare-bones early access.

Besides its almost one year old it tells nothing.

I just want to ask how far into development the dynamic campaign is?

I'm not only tester but also customer. I don't get any discount on product because of 'my testing' so dev don't get any discount on my opinions and expectation. I can understand that beta product have bugs, but I'll never understand lack of professionalism. Simple as that.

I'm reporting a bug and dev fix it and forget to include fix in a patch. So I'm reporting it again and all that i see is 'no need to rush RAZBAM or ED they made huge progress since stone age'. Yeah... good one.

It wasn't a big problem for Leatherneck to release multiple hotfixes for mig21. But who cares, right?

Being unable to properly takeoff with m2k isn't enough reason to upload patch? Wrong files added to last week patch aren't enough reason to upload patch? But there are plenty of reasons to rush for money with 'bonus points sale' :pilotfly:

What is the truth about actual sale? Taken from http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2885405&postcount=45 Taken from http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/2016-08-26_NTTR_Bonus/ Which one is true?

You know, few things are fixed but they need to be polished, some code needs to be broken, kinda c++ stuff.... It needs some time. Razbam already did awesome job, be glad.

Two more weeks are needed.

Did I criticized anyone? Even once? Did you even read my post? No, cuz all of you are busy making 3 page long off topic how great work was done. And by the way its 'Bug Reports' section... so im reporting bug - how hard it can be to understand?

I'm afraid that we all come from the same place, ruled by ED.

One problem, one explanation, tons of bullshit how great RAZBAM is. Stop this stupid spam guys - you will not get a free copy of Razbam next plane ;)

Is this official Razbam statement? :lol:

I've made small patch to 'gospadin EN cockpit', and now it works properly with 1.5.4. http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2880161&postcount=6

Ok, i've made small patch to 'gospadin EN cockpit', and now it works properly with 1.5.4. In copyright matter i did not used any of file modified by gospadin, it is just based on his translation. To use those corrected texture you have to have gospadin cockpit installed and simply replace file named 'M2KC_L2.dds'. Download link: HERE Screenshot by Shadow_1stVFW:

There is one but it have problems with illumination of alarm panel. I can make you one.

It looks so great, I love you mate ;)

I don't know who you are, but i'll find you and hug you ;)

It is possible that you will upload some kind of hotfix or at least tell us what to change in this 'one line of code' in lua I'm assume... ? :music_whistling:

Ohhh my fault ;)

Thanks for your explanation - i couldn't find it earlier. Does the terrain have any impact on radio transmission? If not, will it be modeled in future?

There is some strange behavior when taking off with Mirage when slight crosswinds occurs. Between 60-80 kts of IAS rudder seams to not function at all and its impossible to counter those 4 m/s crosswinds. Don't tell me that its suppose to be that way. 4 m/s is '3' in Beaufort scale - gentle breeze.

Can someone explain me how the 'Line of Sight' and the 'Distance Limitations' works in 1.5.4? Does it means that propagation of radio waves are somehow simulated?