Robbinsat

I'm just dropping in to let you know how awsome I think this is. It's AWSOME. ;)

It seems everyone wanted to start out with an "easy" project so they decided to go with a trainer. I can understand this decision but I dont think it makes his point invalid. At this point we can buy as many modern combat planes as modern trainers and I do think he is right when he says that most players would like planes to fly missions in. If you dont like flying missions and enjoy trainers/civilian aircraft any other flight sim would do. DCS is as much a simulation of weapon systems as it is a simulation of the aircrafts themselves. Trainers do not offer the full kit, simple as that.

I have been lurking this forum for a while but now I felt I had to register to say this. NeilWillis I saw your post both in this thread and in the Hawk thread. There is absolutely NO NEED to talk down to everyone posting on these forums. Nor is there a need to defend every developer decision and promote fanboyism, nothing constructive will come from this. Please allow people to express their opinions and concerns with DCS and its modules without bashing them for it. People are paying money which means that they at least have the right to ask their questions (I am not saying that they should lead the development)