Jump to content

Lordzarj

Members
  • Posts

    138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lordzarj

  1. I will post a video. It doesn t work above mach 0.85!!!

     

    I just tested it 0.88 mach at 1500ft, 0.92 mach at 17000ft and 0.92 mach at 30000ft.

     

    Both AFC and ALT Hold worked perfectly every time.

     

    Are you trimmed properly when engaging?

  2. > This doesn t happen at F18, where u can pull as hard and as long as u like.

     

    The Harrier doesn't have fly by wire, there are no computers sorting everything out for you or preventing you flying out of the envelope. It's harder yes but more rewarding when you get it right, same deal with the F-14, F-5E, prop planes and helos.

  3. So why doesn’t ED offer a server license for the carrier module? Obviously at a premium price, once installed on the server everyone who joins the server can use it.

     

    Individuals can buy the module in the normal way for personal use as well.

  4. Thanks Baltic.

     

    I've been flying the Harrier since release and have only started trying out the training missions in the last week. They are awesome, they are a proper learning experience that puts all the other modules' training to shame. Really well structured, educational and I've learned much more about the Harrier and it's systems than I thought I would.

  5. Is anyone else having problems using modifiers?

     

    I fly VR so map extra buttons to my Warthog with the pinky switch as the modifier button.

     

    For example pinky+DMS down brings up the kneeboard. With the F-14 I have to press the button combination twice for the kneeboard to appear, releasing the pinky switch between button presses.

     

    I use pinky+the weapons release to switch labels on/off but just now instead of dropping my bombs it turned the labels on without the pinky being pressed. Two attack runs failed this way and I could only get the bombs off by unassigning the labels from the modified weapons release.

     

    I don't see any issues with the FA-18, Mirage, Harrier etc. just the F-14.

     

    Short track on the ground showing this attached.

     

    First time kneeboard opens correctly, then needs double-press to close and another double-press to open again.

     

    NWS (pinky+uncage) also requires double-presses to engage and disengage.

    f14.zip

  6. So based on this when I change:

     

    callnames( country.FRANCE, 'AWACS', makeTable('Cyrano','Roxanne' ));

    callnames( country.USA, 'Tankers', makeTable('Texaco','Arco','Shell','EXXON','CHEVRON','DRAGON','HESS',));

     

    to:

     

    callnames( country.FRANCE, 'AWACS', makeTable('Cyrano','Roxanne'));

    callnames( country.USA, 'Tankers', makeTable('Texaco','Arco','Shell','EXXON','CHEVRON','DRAGON','HESS'));

     

    It loaded successfully with the additional callsigns showing in the ME. I think only the second line makes the difference but there was a tab or extra spaces at the end of the first as well.

  7. Hi Jaybird,

     

    No crash log that I can find, relevant lines in dcs.log could be:

     

    2019-03-17 09:09:35.092 ERROR SECURITYCONTROL: Manifest size check failed for file './Scripts/Database/db_callnames.lua'

    2019-03-17 09:09:35.092 ALERT Dispatcher: Error running Scripts/Database/db_scan.lua: [string "./Scripts/Database/db_callnames.lua"]:120: unexpected symbol near ')'

    2019-03-17 09:09:35.092 INFO DCS: application shutdown

     

    and possibly:

     

    2019-03-17 09:09:35.306 WARNING EDOBJECTS: lTypeObjectManager::Create() doesn't exist.

     

    Full log attached

    dcs.zip

  8. Yeah ok I don’t know what any of that is. I re-downloaded and tried again to install the mod today via the readme instructions that accompany the mod and again it prevents DCS from opening.

    No suggestions though?

     

    Unfortunately it does the same for me. Either following the readme instructions or using JGSME.

     

    Strange it works for some people and not others.

     

    Regardless, thanks Jaybird for your work on this a greater variety of callsigns is badly needed and I'm sure someone will work out the issue some of us are having.

  9. After today's OB patch the KC-135 MPRS has both drogues streaming before you declare "ready pre-contact". This is more realistic from what I read around the forum.

     

    After clearing contact I couldn't make contact with the right drogue (probe went straight through it), so I guess you will still need to be a multiplayer 2-ship to use the right drogue.

     

    It would be nice to use the right side occasionally when flying solo but I guess the tanker logic is controlled by ED rather than RAZBAM.

  10. Can't see why. It's a bomb. Just need weight and loading flight tests, plus release test and weapon integration. EMP proofing upgrade is probably the largest factor.

     

    The fusing and security of a nuke need to be pretty precise, you don't really want them being dropped unauthorised or on the wrong targets......

     

    Nukes have a few extra requirements than your typical dumb bomb. The ballistic challenge of getting one in the correct place is the easy part.

  11. We will remember how well it was done far longer than how fast it was done.

     

    You realise you are in ED Forums at the moment?

     

    It's not the impression you would get from reading most of the threads....

     

    The silent majority agree though. :thumbup:

  12. Old Sea Harriers FR.S of FAA in Falklands, shot down A-4's, Etendards, and got 9 IAI Neshers (formerly of Israeli AF), using guns and AIM-9L (1st gen all aspect). Their sensor was MK1 stereoscopic optical sensor, and radar guidance from RN ships.

     

    The Sea Harrier FRS.1 was pretty much brand new at the time of the Falklands Conflict rather than old. The FRS.1 had the Blue Fox radar so they had onboard BVR (just about) sensors.

     

    The Argentinians did not lose any Etendards in the conflict but Pucara, Mirage III and C-130 can be added to the the Sea Harrier kills.

     

    I guess its arguable why the Harrier pilots were so dominant in 1982. I don't think the Harrier is intrinsically a great dogfighter. It's likely a combination of a superior weapon, better training, not being at the edge of fuel limits in the combat area and significantly training in DACM with French Mirages before heading South.

  13. Agreed there is no place for the BL755 on the AV-8B NA.

     

    There are some pretty big differences with the the GR.7/9 and I suspect software/wiring differences were not insignificant.

     

    The GR could carry Sniper XR and TERMA pods on the belly gun pod stations for example had the Zeus ECM suite, always fitted the outrigger pylons and also commonly used British 540lb dumb bombs, Brimstone and CRV-7 rocket pods.

     

    I would love to see all of this in game but we need a GR.7 or 9 which RAZBAM have said previously they would do if they can get the info.

×
×
  • Create New...