Kiwispirits
-
Posts
79 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Kiwispirits
-
-
No mention of a fix for dumb bombing accuracy. Hope they get a fix in (or DCS gets a fix in) even though it is not in these notes.
-
1
-
-
In some headsets the thump sound of the radar scan hitting the stops is loud enough to be irritating/tiring. Is there any chance of putting a volume control for that in the game, perhaps in the special tab of the settings menu?
-
This works, but the naming seems unusual. As I understand it this is the F15E S4+ version not the SE version.
Other locations within the DCS program use F15-E as their folder label -
I created one new, and copied one old kneeboard png file into the location:
"User/saved games/dcs.openbeta/kneeboard/F15E" but these two custom kneenboards do not appear in the kneeboard in the aircraft.
The standard kneeboards (Caucasus kneeboards etc) do appear.
Other custom kneeboards in their separate folders (e.g. "User/saved games/dcs.openbeta/kneeboard/F14B") do load into their respective aircraft.
I think this might be something that has not been implemented yet because I had to create the "F15E" folder in that location, it was not created by the patch update nor the download of the aircraft.-
1
-
-
To confirm some of the testing above:
I have a SAM single mission which I use to try the LD-10 on the JF-17 and also the HARM on the F16 using the HTS pod. Tests done at 35,000 ft and 0.7 Mach.
For the LD-10:
I can get SAM kills at 40nm in ACT (pre-planned target point) from 35k ft and 0.7 Mach. The missile lofts after launch, giving it good range. Closer range shots seem to be slightly more accurate. The LD-10 does not always hit the radar in the face but lands close enough to kill about 80% of the time.
For Passive and self-protect mode launching the LD-10 in level flight at 35k ft and 0.7 Mach only has about 15 to 20nm range as the missile goes straight from the pylon to the target. Kill % a bit lower than ACT mode as it sometimes falls short.
Repeating Passive and self-protect mode but raising the nose of the aircraft to about 15 to 20 degrees before launch will loft the missiles in a way that is very similar to the ACT launch, and I get similar ranges and kills to the ACT mode (35 to 40nm and about 80% kill)
For the HARM launched from a lock with the HTS pod in the F16:
Results are almost identical to those from the LD-10 in ACT mode - 35-40nm, about 80% kill rate. Not every shot igoes to the face of the radar but hits close enough to kill it.
So in summary:
The LD-10 is at least as effective as the HARM provide you use the correct mode and launch method: Try to set up for ACT (pre-planned) and if you cannot do this remember to angle the nose of the aircraft to 15 to 20 deg before launching in Passive or Self-protect. Longer range shots will have a lower kill rate.
Do not forget to equip the jamming pod and have it in standby or jamming mode. It will then move the radar icons on the horizontal situation display to show their actual range and bearing, making estimation of range (and therefore likelihood of impact and kill) far easier.For employment of the LD-10/JF-17 in the SEAD role by using the methods above, I think it is satisfactory. I know others might disagree.
I could not find enough difference between the two missiles to consider the LD-10 bugged.-
4
-
-
Please remove this from the bug list. It was all my fault.
I had double bound the zoom to both a switch and an analogue control.
My apologies for the error.-
2
-
-
Since patch 2.8.0.32937 was introduced today the TPod zoom control has a new bug.
When the TPod is fully zoomed in using "Sensor WMD7TV UP" (in either narrow or wide mode) the zoom will suddenly pull back out to no zoom.
This happens at random time intervals.
This happens in CCD, IR Black hot and IR White hot modes.
It does not happen if you have a target lock while zoomed in.
I checked the HOTAS control that I have Sensor WMD7TV UP and Sensor WMD7TV DOWN bound to, and there are no spurious or random signals being generated.
I have the same HOTAS control bound to the zoom of targetting pods in other airframes in the same mission (such as the AV8b Harrier) and they do not have this problem. -
The changes to the TPod CCD mode made by Deka in patch 2.8.0.32937 have made big improvements.
The L2/L3 and L4/L5 buttons have much better control over gain and levels.
The focus control is now working automatically.
The CCD picture has better clarity and contrast.
Happy with this, thanks.
There is a new bug with the TPod zoom, but I will start a separate thread for that.-
1
-
-
On 11/14/2022 at 7:07 PM, uboats said:
you can use L2/L3, L4/L5
You misunderstand me. I know you can press on L2/L3 and L4/5 and they are meant to alter light levels and gain. However there is no combination of these buttons that will give a clear CCD picture with good contrast. The picture is always bad, and has been that way for months.
-
On 11/12/2022 at 11:15 AM, uboats said:
just to confirm, you want to adjust CCD level/gain using MFCD brt/cont button?
I would like a reasonable level of contrast within the CCD TPOD display please.
The MFCD buttons currently do not do this.
I do not mind which controls are used to do this. -
The CCD Tpod lack of contrast has been reported for three months.
Problems with the LD10 being ineffective have been reported for six months.
Other third party developers have fixed their missile issues in weeks, not months, even if they have to upload hotfixes after changes are made by ED.
Why are these taking so long to fix please? -
The level and contrast controls do not remedy the problem in CCD as there is almost no contrast between light and dark areas on the display regardless of level and contrast button settings.
-
Does not look like any change to CCD mode happened in October, so still on track for November?
-
I really really really hope they get multithreading going before my CPU tries to cope with the level of detail on this map.
-
2
-
-
9 hours ago, hannibal said:
bought gigabyte 4090 gaming OC at microcenter
i just tried DCS
with samsung Odyssey.. wow.. 90 fps all the way thru with visibility range to ultra, and 2x MSAA. (note, i was using 2080ti, and most of the time it was 50 fps)
it went down to 70 with 4x MSAA on 4090
but wow.. so smooth on the odyssey headset.. and it was a joy to have things on high and ultra..seeing things nice
going to try out aero later
my 4090 purchase experience.
i was shooting for gigabyte OC or zotac OC.
waiting on the line to get in the store, a few said they were going for ASUS or MSI
i went for gigabyte because i have bought in past with no problem but bummed that there is no more EVGA.
drove home and start to question if i brought the right brand
later on i looked up clocks and saw that MSI OC had the higher (excluding the ridiculously priced ASUS)
and then i was eating myself up for not getting MSI,
to find out they MSI gaming trio X has a power connecter that splits into three...
(gigabyte gaming OC has a 4 way split PSU connector)
now i am glad i bought the Gigabyte model....
Any chance you could post a shot of the screen settings page from DCS that you used when you got 90 fps please?
-
2
-
-
Thanks Uboats
-
Any update on this please? I have given up on the JF17 for CAS and switched to the Harrier because of the poor targeting pod picture in the JF 17
-
Alt-enter no longer maximises the VR mirror.
Pain for VR, because despite selecting "mouse confined to game window" I can still unfocus the VR mirror and headset by clicking in my periphery while wearing the VR rig. Been that way for years, through 3 different rigs on different drivers and platforms.Alt-entering the mirror was the only way of fixing it.-
5
-
-
-
While the radar is in Intc TWS mode, S2_right does not change radar azimuth. The button beside the display does change the azimuth.
While in RWS mode, S2_right DOES change radar azimuth, and so does the button beside the display. -
Thanks for the update uboats
-
Is the targeting pod working as expected in CCD mode please? It seems to lack contrast regardless of level controls, which makes it hard to pick out objects in crowded areas such as trees/towns. Contrast is low compared to the ATFLIR pod on the FA 18, although I appreciate that is a different pod on a different MFD type.
The JF 17 IR mode has much higher contrast but of course has disadvantages for cold objects. -
Unexpected, but confirmed
-
You used to be able to turn off all the buttons on the AAP panel by holding the OFF button down for a few seconds. This no longer works. You can turn all the individual buttons off one by one, except the AAP INS button.
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
in DCS: F-4 Phantom
Posted
Does the offer to extend the preorder discount for those that cancel at this time apply to those who preordered via DCS?
If so, how does one go about cancelling a pre-order please? This is not because of the delays but rather as your videos have come out I feel the module is more complex than I wish to deal with at this time.