SpudmanWP

Damn that was quick ;) You are up sinelnic

Here you go

I think the FAA Dagger/Finger The clue is the position and number of edited-out markings :) Just kidding... Air data probe under the nose and strakes on the upper tailfin. Here is the original

No, you were first. My initial guess was Alpha Jet at 9:55pm, you said IA 63 at 9:55pm, and I added AT-63 (which was wrong) at 9:57pm. You are up, you deserve it

My bad... I still had the page up and I edited it without refreshing first :( I picked up the clue on the AT-63 while looking at the Alpha Jet Wiki Page. The AT-63 wiki page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMA_IA_63_Pampa In my haste to post, I typed the name of the upgraded IA 63 which is the AT-63. Single canopy and engine is a giveaway.. IA 63. Cammo pattern is a match to this: Good job MVSGAS

Alpha Jet, looking for a specific model or AT-63 Pampa

I have been as cles as ~100 yards to a A-10's target in training. It was AWESOME :) Although I do not know the details of the video, if the pilot hit the target, then the FAC needs to be smacked. IIRC, there was an incident a while back where the FAC accidentally called in the GPS coordinates of his own position. OOPS.

That oblong opening in the cowling (on the front-right side) threw me and made me think Auster :(

I think it's an Auster or Taylorcraft with a STOL wing & flap setup, but I do not know the specific model yet. But I may be wrong ;)

Yes, that was the YMC-130H... More info & video here about the plane and the rescue attempt: http://www.encyclopedia.com/video/UxfpGPWtoOY-ymc130h-credible-sport-vtolestol-by.aspx You're up X-man.

GE and RR are welcome to complete the F136 dev on their own. The Congress is welcome to fund the F136 as long as it is separate from the F-35 budget. The reason is simple, any money taken from the F-35 program will result in longer development & training programs due to the lack of LRIP jets for the pilots and maintaininers to train on. This will result in longer acquisition schedules and higher overall prices for the F-35.

KD-10, K/AKD10, or HJ-10 Here you go.. this should be fun :) And NO, that's not a Veritech fighter about to unleash it's missile load ;) In case you missed it, here is the Veritech reference.

Yes, it's a XO-47 :)

You tricky tricky person :) It was a captured Arsenal-Delanne 10, a French plane. Captured may be the wrong word since it's development was finished under German occupation. Here we go.... I will be gone for several hours, so if you KNOW you are right, go ahead and post the next one.

Reminds me of this British mod.

Bingo... your turn

Next

Safir-43

F2A-1 to be precise.. your turn Original : http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/ac-usn22/f-types/f2a-cam.htm

Here it is:

It did... but that's not where I found it. I found it here: http://airminded.org/2007/03/07/flying-fortresses/ give me a few to come up with something :)

Farman F.222

My mistake, the .ru threw me. I just joined yesterday. Your up.

Close, PVRD-430. Damn, I knew posting a Russian test plane on a Russian forum would not last long. ;)

Yes, but what makes this one special?