Jump to content

Antartis

Members
  • Posts

    660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Antartis

  1. Some say that the images are from photoshop, I think they are right ...
  2. From Russian forum From paralay
  3. I found from militaryphotos.net New Russian airline brands, argue that it is official, but found no source. Not sure what a threat were to put, I thought it might be useful for the DCS. Here shows the dimensions of the signals.
  4. Look to my post #882 ;)
  5. From paralay.com anyone for translate? :P
  6. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO-STAGE-TO-ORBIT ROCKET AND AIRBREATHING REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES FOR MILITARY APPLICATIONS It is in pdf http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA451531&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf It has only 254 pages :D
      • 1
      • Like
  7. Semi-funny :D
  8. From www.inosmi.ru Google Translate source http://www.inosmi.ru/army/20100313/158588233.html
  9. From www.aviaport.ru in google translate source http://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2010/03/12/191688.html
  10. From original sukhoi.org In google translation (russian-english)
  11. source http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20100311/158161315.html
  12. source http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20100311/158159986.html
  13. What you said reminds me of submarine tactics :D
  14. Yes, it's a shame. The aerospace program now is simply the shadow of the old Nasa...:(
  15. If I am not mistaken, the same video that I present myself or someone else (do not remember lol :doh:) with English subtitles.
  16. Very nice photos! Thanks for sharing!!:thumbup: It seems more to ship than by plane .... Too bad that did not go ..:(
  17. source http://www.zinio.com/reader.jsp?o=int&pub=69582310&prev=sub&offer=274582255
  18. Yes, it is lighter by 3.5 tonnes back there, but always two-seater family flanker in anyway appear larger. Again, I think Pak Fa is important smaller than the whole family Flanker.
  19. GGTharos, I agree with you, but for me it is inexplicable to withdraw from 2025. We know that any new program in our time gets even decades with delays and costly changes. And I do not think it would withdraw from 2025, surely there will be a structural upgrading. USAF needs these fighters and those F-22s that has the size of the USA is very little. What will address the PAK FA if sell in some countries and happen to need to address them? Sure no F-35...:P
  20. Then with fighter to replace the F-22? Logically then, the fleet of F-15 will be withdrawn from service and not think to replace the F-35, I do not think have the best performance, load weapons and stealth.
  21. http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2010/03/airforce_30_year_plan_030610w/ Why?
  22. Plan lays out aircraft acquisition through 2040 http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2010/03/airforce_30_year_plan_030610w/
  23. From hitechweb.genezis.eu http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/fightersSF04.htm ...and photoshop time :D From www.militaryphotos.net As I see it, so I like it! :wub:
×
×
  • Create New...