chuck04 Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 It's always false, at least in the english subtitles, i don't understand russian
Mowgli Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 explain please...:huh: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel i5 4690K | ASUS Z-97PRO Gaming Mobo | Nvidia Gigabyte GTX970 3.5/0.5 GB Windforce3 | G.Skill Ripjaws-X 2x8GB DDR3 1600Mhz | Samsung Evo 120GB SSD | Win10 Pro | Antec 750w 80 Bronze Modular
chuck04 Posted November 27, 2014 Author Posted November 27, 2014 It should report bearing range and altitude of bandits, the bearing is always false, sometimes it reports contacts which are behind giving range, i can't do that... with the RWR spo15 beryoza... this thing is a nightmare, unable to make the distinction between friendly/foe a nightmare I know now it's false with an awacs reporting all contacts. AI gps and compas seems destroyed or jammed !! Is there a command to tell the wing man shut up your drunk !!?
Exorcet Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 It's not clear what you're saying exactly. Wingmen report heading relative to your heading I think. This is different from AWACS. Awaiting: DCS F-15C Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files
chuck04 Posted November 27, 2014 Author Posted November 27, 2014 Is it the bullseye way ? My wingman reporting is close to me, his heading to the target is the same as me. Well i guess it must be the bullshit thing, i need a secretary to do the nav no time to calculate it's war ! i've got to act quickly even wrongly, i've been killed by this stupid wingman the other day, this guy is jerry lewis, bad humor really...
Robin_Hood Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 Very probably not Bulleye, no. The AWACS sometimes uses Bullseye, though, but all such calls are preceded by "Bulls" (should be "Bullseye" in full, really, but I guess they are lazy). I am still unsure as to what your problem is, could you give an exemple of a radio communication that you seems wrong to you? Also, don't mix up AWACS, Wingmen and SPO, there's really no relation to each other. Oh, and yes, the SPO has quite some shortcomings. 2nd French Fighter Squadron
chuck04 Posted November 28, 2014 Author Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) No prob, i know sispeo(SPO) is a robot, wingmen is human(hence the mistake) and awacs is a coward very far away from the front line. I had almost forgotten the DCS world, been in the bms falcon (incredible also) and i must say... time has made something promising a blast, what an experience sometimes... hard to believe... A gtx 970 msi made a big difference also, although there are always compromise with those soft and a bit of tuning. But the feeling to understand the tactics of modern air warfare is really unbelievable. I tried other mission and didn't encounter the false bearing report, maybe that was a bogey under ma radar cone don't know... the air combat is really another thing with an awacs, it's a big light, we know how many bandits there are when in the furball, less unknowns... it's easier to discriminate the false alarm and know what's going on... but what an unfair advantage with the us planes/systems versus russian ones... Well that's not totally true, because when you can reach the Within Visual Range, this offboresight helmet mounted cueing system with the R73 archer is really an advantage. But surviving the Beyond Visual Range is quiet hard, trying to get in the visual with EO systems coming from six o'clock. I got to figure out how i did it, i came behing 3 f18 and one f15 by surprise although they have awacs to, shot 2 with 27ET and killed the F15 in the furball while excaping the missiles of the F18 and letting him behind with a bingo fuel. That was intense... but shouldn't happen. maybe they were returning home with few missiles left, i took the chance and i fill like maverick... stupid of me... Edited November 28, 2014 by chuck04
Recommended Posts