Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been running a few test comparing the before takeoff 'Emergency Fuel System Check' against what we have simulated for our F86F-35, there's few differences here.

 

For reference here's the relevant pages from the F-86F Flight Manual.

 

click for larger versions

Emergency_Fuel_0001s.jpg Emergency_Fuel_0001as.jpg Emergency_Fuel_0002s.jpg

Emergency_Fuel_0003s.jpg Emergency_Fuel_0004s.jpg Emergency_Fuel_0006.jpg

 

 

Emergency Fuel System Check

Emergency_Fuel_0007.jpg

Emergency_Fuel_0008.jpg

Emergency_Fuel_0011.jpg

Emergency_Fuel_0012.jpg

 

Emergency_Fuel_0009.jpg

 

 

I ran a series of test at Batumi (Altitude 37 Feet, Standard Pressure), using V1.5.2.48162.126 of DCS. With each test I changed outside temperature, starting at -50°c and worked up to +50°c in 5°c intervals, noting the max RPM achieved with both Normal and Emergency fuel selected.

 

Emergency_Fuel_0015.jpg

 

Then I plotted the results (red line) on to the graph from the manual.

 

Emergency_Fuel_0010.jpg

 

The rpm does drop with temperature, but as you can see it's way off, less than 100% RPM only being achieved once below -36°c.

 

The manual states that the emergency fuel system is set to give 99% rpm on a 100°F (+38°c) day.

 

Emergency_Fuel_0021.jpg

 

and with a temperature hotter than +38°c, to be careful not to over speed the engine as higher than 100% rpm could be achieved.

 

 

 

The manual also states

 

Emergency_Fuel_0020.jpg

 

I take this to mean the sudden fuel surge when the emergency system kicked in would send the exhaust temperature soaring way above limits if the engine wasn't already at a high enough rpm (or at a low enough idle rpm so the EGT would remain within limits).

 

If you switch the Emergency Fuel on at say 70% or 75% nothing particularly abnormal happens at the moment, the EGT hardly changes.

 

This is mentioned again in the Emergency Procedures section,

 

Emergency_Fuel_0022.jpg

 

if it was considered safer to ditch straight ahead, rather than try switching the Emergency Fuel switch on below 80%, the consequences of doing so must have been fairly catastrophic!

 

Emergency_Fuel_0017.jpg

 

 

Lastly, when switching back to the Normal fuel system (switching the Emergency Fuel switch Off), there should be a bigger drop in RMP initially, because the main fuel regulator took time to recover from the disabled condition.

 

Emergency_Fuel_0023.jpg

 

At the moment switching from Normal to Emergency and Emergency to Normal both cause same small rpm drop.

 

 

Summary of differences and problems.

1) The maximum engine rpm with the Emergency Fuel system engaged needs adjusting to match the temperature graph.

 

2) Switching the Emergency Fuel switch On below 80% rpm (not including idle) should cause dangerous engine overheating or compressor stall.

 

3) Switching from Emergency Fuel to Normal Fuel should cause a bigger rpm drop than going from Normal to Emergency.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...