Jump to content

Why is the matchup 120B vs R27ER/ET barely discussed?


Recommended Posts

Posted

As we all know once in a while comes up a thread how bad the R27ER is, but the last time a interesting suggestion was made that I don't see discussed by the online community. Why is nobody testing a map with the 120C banned?

 

The problem atm regarding radar missiles is that they can be ranked and the perforamce difference is often really big, with the closest matchup probably between the 530d and 7. So for every matchup we play there is one missile that is simply the best in every way.

 

But when we take the 120C out of the equation, the R27ER suddenly becomes the kinetically best missile while the 120B is still an ARH with a better chaff resistance. Removing the 120C would bring the performance of all 3 4th gen fighters closer to each other.

 

No, I don't say that I want the 120C overall banned or something, but why is this topic never discussed? I don't know a server or a event that runs a map with only the 120C beeing banned. And even in the last topic it's not really beeing discussed and I wonder why? So I'm making this one here to bring a little bit attention to it, because I think that's something worth testing.

Posted

it makes little difference in practice. seeking is so atrocious on R27 that it could move at mach10+ and it would still be junk.

Posted
;3070018']The AMRAAM B is just as deadly as the Charlie in DCS, there is not a lot between them at all.

 

Thats why most missions without the C remove the B also, the difference really is tiny.

 

 

Yes, it is tiny, but it's imo quite notable and can make the difference. It would level the playingfield a bit. Personally I have an easier time defeating Bs than Cs.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...