[USER ERROR] M-2000 strange bugs

[myHelljumper]

You set the CP/PD on the BUT 20, but you have the BUT 06 in DEST, that's why you are having issues.

 

Please, provide us a track so we can reproduce the issue and see if it's a bug.

 

This is the last time I tell you to stop with the sarcasm, I you keep it up I'll close this thread.

We can be respectful and find the issue together, or you can be sarcastic about it and find the solution yourself.

 

Edit : And I'm still not sure what the issue is, you need to be a bit more specific.

Edited May 24, 2021 by myHelljumper

[Galinette]

50 minutes ago, 303_Vins said:

Incorrect WPT Indication on HUD. (opposite to HSI)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LjZchk4xylDwStSKzPrpE8UGICe9NxRY/view?usp=sharing

runway

 

No. On this screenshot there is no WPT indication. The open box is the ILS loc capture director.

 

51 minutes ago, 303_Vins said:

WHERE is WPT ?

HERE.  Probably drifted because of Alignement done using external power. That may be the problem.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P-jHB4VS1byblDNyjreAzASiRTgZx4ve/view?usp=sharing

 

 

 

Yes, this is due to drift. I don't know your alignment class but this is not abnormal, the INS drifts. External power has no effect on this, only alignment class and flight time.

 

Now, one thing might be a bug on your screenshot, the virtual runway too high. Since it's perfectly symmetrical vs horizon to what it should be I suspect a mod conflict or something like that.

 

 

[Rayak]

10 minutes ago, Kercheiz said:

 

 

Now, one thing might be a bug on your screenshot, the virtual runway too high. Since it's perfectly symmetrical vs horizon to what it should be I suspect a mod conflict or something like that.

 

 

 

I got this too this afternoon, but it was when I was landing at counter-QFU (shame on me for not contacting the ATC). I don't know if it's the cause for the reverse synthetic runway symbology but it's the only instance I encountered this bug.

[Galinette]

OK, I just tested.

 

Since your flight plan arrives to kobuleti by the east, it sets CP to 250.0, not 70.0
Now you are doing your approach from the west.

If the CP is incorrect, the synth runway is wrong. And it appears that if you set CP to the opposite angle (180° error) your synth runway gets inverted.

 

So try again by manually setting your CP to 070.0 in PCN on your waypoint 6.

 

Mission editor sets automatically CP and PD to the direction from the flight plan. You still need to check it's correct upon landing.

 

Yes, it might have worked in a previous version, because the synth runway was basically fake. It just took the 4 corners of the runway and displayed it in the HUD. Without any relation to CP, PD, QFE and ILS data.
 

The only bug I can see is that it should probably not display the synth runway when you are off your CP by more than 90 degrees. So you should see no ILS at all because your CP setting is wrong by 180 degrees.

Edited May 24, 2021 by Kercheiz

[Galinette]

15 minutes ago, Rayak said:

 

I got this too this afternoon, but it was when I was landing at counter-QFU (shame on me for not contacting the ATC). I don't know if it's the cause for the reverse synthetic runway symbology but it's the only instance I encountered this bug.

 

Yes, confirmed. At counter QFU (or CP +180) the synth runway appears symmetrical to the runway. It should simply be hidden in that case.

[Galinette]

[303_Vins]

Sorry Guys i have uninstaled M-2 from my DCS for now.  Each time i get in to cockpit i got FPS drop or even often DCS crash.

In my favourite planes ILS function well and no crashes. 

So i dont want to waste my time. Have plasure from flying not from fighting witg DCS or Razbam.

Maybe should check  waypoints locations.

Probably the previous waypoint ( landing WPT minus Landing WPT) should be placed  on radial not more than 90 degrees from Final radial inbound.

[myHelljumper]

I still don't understand what the problem was, as your English is not very good...

 

To me it look like you made an error while configuring the aircraft for the ILS as highlighted by Kercheiz, but it look like you don't really want to find a solution to your problem, you rather want to insult the dev team and the people that try to help you.

 

I'm locking this thread now.