Skuva Posted March 18, 2023 Share Posted March 18, 2023 (edited) The S-25L seems to have a burn profile that makes no sense to me. It's peak velocity gets capped at around mach 1.3 for about 3 seconds of burn, regardless of lauch parameters (high or low, slow or fast, level or steep diving). Compared to its dumb brothers the S-25-O and OFM, which can easily go mach 2 in a shorter burn. Sketching their speeds would look like this Yes, it gets a very flat line, it accelerates gradually and upon reaching that point the velocity gets completely fixed. Isn't it suposed to just be the same rocket (booster) but with a laser sensor? So burn profile should be the same. There are a few info out there claiming the S-25L reach mach 2, which could just be a copy paste misunderstanding and there is actually some differences the soviets engineered for some reason. I remember when I started with DCS many years ago, I read on some ancient thread people discussing how the S-25L could be better than the Kh-25ML in very short ranges because it had a shorter time to target due to its faster burn and initial acceleration. S-25.trk Edited March 18, 2023 by Skuva 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuva Posted March 24, 2023 Author Share Posted March 24, 2023 (edited) Adding to it. I've also spotted this same weird hard coded speed limit behaviour on many SAM's, like SA-2, Patriot, but most absurdly on Hawk (which gets locked at mach 1.75 for most of its flight at 1000m). But this limit is not present for SA-10, maybe the coded value is higher than its Q limit. In the case of the S-25L it's quite easy to see the problem firing it in a very steep dive. You see the missile gaining speed, then when it reach the speed limit it starts to slow down, while still burning in a dive, because the speed limit seems to be coded as a function of altitude. From my understanding this behaviour could not come from just dynamic pressure, as the transition into max Q would be smooth and not a sudden flat line after a point, even worse if you consider twr should increase as fuel burn. Edited March 25, 2023 by Skuva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts