Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi...

So I am wondering, how much supersampling do people use with those HMDs? Isn´t it pretty hard for even e 4090 to push all those pixels (even with DFR)?

I went for the QPro intentionally because I thought it would be insane to go for such hi res HMD...but then again I also supersample by about x1,7 also which ends up rendering more than 3000x3000 per eye. 

So my question actually is: Does the need to supersample actually decrease with a higher native resolution so that at the end it doesn´t even impact performance that much?

 

My specs: 13700K/4090

 vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

image.png

Posted (edited)

Hi,

 

I don't need any AA with my Crystal to get a 4K Monitor like picture. I have to use Eye Tracking for this.

You can use DLSS or only DLAA if a little shimmer at the edge of your vision is bad for you. With DLSS you will get much more blur as with DLAA only, but you will get with both ghosting at !!every!! fast moving object.

You don't have to add any kind of supersampling with one of those VR-HS, and the picture will look a way better as with a quest pro. 😉

Edited by Nedum

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9800X3D, System-RAM: 64 GB DDR5, GPU: nVidia 4090, Monitor: LG 38" 3840*1600, VR-HMD: Pimax Crystal/Super, OS: Windows 11 Pro, HD: 2*2TB and 1*4 TB (DCS) Samsung M.2 SSD

HOTAS Throttle: TM Warthog Throttle with TM F16 Grip, Orion2 Throttle with F15EX II Grip with Finger Lifts

HOTAS Sticks: Moza FFB A9 Base with TM F16 Stick, FSSB R3 Base with TM F16 Stick

Rudder: WinWing Orion Metal

Posted (edited)

Inversely, I see no noticable ghosting with DLSS in the aero, DLAA alone is slightly crisper but then it's 20fps slower; on my hardware it's a no brainer, especially as I see no negatives to it.

No AA is not an option for me though, even at 39ppd in the aero DCS is still a shimmerfest, MSAAx2 almost gets rid of it but DLAA completely eliminates it 🙂

Edited by edmuss

Ryzen7 7800X3D / RTX3080ti / 64GB DDR5 4800 / Varjo Aero / Leap Motion / Kinect Headtracking
TM 28" Warthog Deltasim Hotas / DIY Pendular Rudders / DIY Cyclic Maglock Trimmer / DIY Abris / TM TX 599 evo wheel / TM T3PA pro / DIY 7+1+Sequential Shifter / DIY Handbrake / Cobra Clubman Seat
Shoehorned into a 43" x 43" cupboard.

Posted (edited)

I don't supersample at all, set the resolution in varjo base. Generally it's one of the following configurations: -

35ppd and downsample the peripheral to 0.85

Or

39ppd and downsample the peripheral to 0.75

Some people supersample the focus area as well but it's rather have the frames as I'm GPU limited.

Edit: for reference, at 39ppd foveated, the aero pixel count is about 14mp. The G2 @100% render resolution is 19.5mp.

Edited by edmuss

Ryzen7 7800X3D / RTX3080ti / 64GB DDR5 4800 / Varjo Aero / Leap Motion / Kinect Headtracking
TM 28" Warthog Deltasim Hotas / DIY Pendular Rudders / DIY Cyclic Maglock Trimmer / DIY Abris / TM TX 599 evo wheel / TM T3PA pro / DIY 7+1+Sequential Shifter / DIY Handbrake / Cobra Clubman Seat
Shoehorned into a 43" x 43" cupboard.

Posted

It's annoying that they aren't willing to offer a lower refresh rate, however I've found the varjo runtime to be pretty smooth even below refresh rate; certainly much better than WMR.

With a 4090 and decent CPU you should be hitting 90fps in most modules. Some scenarios it's just not possible of course.

With my system I'm at about 75-85fps in the hind on Caucasus and about 5fps less on Syria (apart from Damascus which is about 65-70fps). A10C and AV8B are pegged to 90fps nearly all the time.

  • Like 1

Ryzen7 7800X3D / RTX3080ti / 64GB DDR5 4800 / Varjo Aero / Leap Motion / Kinect Headtracking
TM 28" Warthog Deltasim Hotas / DIY Pendular Rudders / DIY Cyclic Maglock Trimmer / DIY Abris / TM TX 599 evo wheel / TM T3PA pro / DIY 7+1+Sequential Shifter / DIY Handbrake / Cobra Clubman Seat
Shoehorned into a 43" x 43" cupboard.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...