Jump to content

Recommended Quest 3 VR settings for Intel 10600k, RTX3090, 32 GB DDR4


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys,

I'm really struggling to find a sweet spot between graphic quality and decent frame rates. I have tried different combinations using multithreading openXR, openXR toolkit, oculus tray tool, open composite, and endlessly tweaked graphic settings within the game. 

I just can't seem to find a happy medium. Seems as though the only way I can achieve anything beyond 35 FPS results in terrible visual quality. I know I'm not rocking an RTX4090, and I don't expect to max out the graphics. However, I feel like my rig should still be more than capable of producing some decent visual quality with playable framerates. 

I'm hoping someone else out there has a similar setup that can lend some advice or preferably share their VR settings.

My complete setup:

Asus Gaming z490 plus Tuf mobo

Intel i5 10600k OC @ 4.8 ghz

Asus RTX 3090 Strix factory OC graphics card

32 gb Corsair 3200 ddr4 ram 

WD 2TB sn750 SSD

1200 Watt eVGA supernova platinum power supply 

Quest 3 VR headset

Posted

Odd. I have a Q3 with RTX4070 and i get 72 fps most of the time. I use PD of 1 and no oversampling. I use QVFR and playing with MSAA and DLAA. I ca share some exact setting tonight

I7-10700F | RTX4070 FE | 32G RAM | Quest 2/3 | TM T16000 HOTAS & Throttle | F/A-18C | F-14A/B | F-15C | A-10 II | F-4E

Posted
28 minutes ago, JesterIsDead said:

Odd. I have a Q3 with RTX4070 and i get 72 fps most of the time. I use PD of 1 and no oversampling. I use QVFR and playing with MSAA and DLAA. I ca share some exact setting tonight

Please do. Rtx3090 should be comparable. I have tried DLAA and it looks good but I'm only getting about 35 fps. The ghosting is really annoying but I think I could live with it if I could get some decent fps. 

Posted (edited)

here is my system setting. You can even turn down texture to medium for more FPS. I use 72 Hz oculus link. I reduce the FOV to .85 using ODT/OTT. No supersampling (it's at zero). 

Screen_240228_174910.jpg

Screenshot 2024-02-28 175449.png

Edited by JesterIsDead

I7-10700F | RTX4070 FE | 32G RAM | Quest 2/3 | TM T16000 HOTAS & Throttle | F/A-18C | F-14A/B | F-15C | A-10 II | F-4E

Posted
14 hours ago, JesterIsDead said:

here is my system setting. You can even turn down texture to medium for more FPS. I use 72 Hz oculus link. I reduce the FOV to .85 using ODT/OTT. No supersampling (it's at zero). 

Screen_240228_174910.jpg

Screenshot 2024-02-28 175449.png

 

What do you have your PD set at in the game under the VR tab?

Posted
On 2/28/2024 at 5:18 PM, JesterIsDead said:

Odd. I have a Q3 with RTX4070 and i get 72 fps most of the time. I use PD of 1 and no oversampling. I use QVFR and playing with MSAA and DLAA. I ca share some exact setting tonight

Where can I find QVFR? I'm not familiar with that.

Posted

Yes, It wont be dynamic. You can adjust the view window

I7-10700F | RTX4070 FE | 32G RAM | Quest 2/3 | TM T16000 HOTAS & Throttle | F/A-18C | F-14A/B | F-15C | A-10 II | F-4E

Posted
5 hours ago, killerquagmire said:

This works with the Quest 3?

It works but it may be suboptimal due to your pc specs. QVFR is made for headsets with eye tracking and Quest 3 doesn't have that. It also comes with a noticeable CPU load and yours is not a powerful one.

If I were you I'd use the 'Fixed Foveated Rendering' option that comes with OpenXR Toolkit. It's from the same author.

https://mbucchia.github.io/OpenXR-Toolkit/

 

Posted
On 3/5/2024 at 4:08 PM, diego999 said:

It works but it may be suboptimal due to your pc specs. QVFR is made for headsets with eye tracking and Quest 3 doesn't have that. It also comes with a noticeable CPU load and yours is not a powerful one.

If I were you I'd use the 'Fixed Foveated Rendering' option that comes with OpenXR Toolkit. It's from the same author.

https://mbucchia.github.io/OpenXR-Toolkit/

Roger that. I'm going to do a complete rebuild when the RTX5090 drops. I know that's quite a ways off so I considered upgrading my CPU in the meantime since it's a relatively inexpensive cost of around 300 bucks for an i9 LGA1200 10 core processor.  Just don't know if I will see enough gains to justify it. 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...