Aapje Posted May 24 Posted May 24 @pegasus1 Nvidia does market frame generation as a DLSS technology, although in my opinion that is a marketing-driven decision, to improve acceptance of frame generation due to how strong the DLSS-branding is. But it can make it confusing, and it is better to explicitly specify whether you are talking about upscaling or frame gen, rather than use the word 'DLSS' and assume that people will interpret it as merely referring to upscaling.
pegasus1 Posted May 24 Posted May 24 9 hours ago, Aapje said: @pegasus1 Nvidia does market frame generation as a DLSS technology, although in my opinion that is a marketing-driven decision, to improve acceptance of frame generation due to how strong the DLSS-branding is. But it can make it confusing, and it is better to explicitly specify whether you are talking about upscaling or frame gen, rather than use the word 'DLSS' and assume that people will interpret it as merely referring to upscaling. Its what happens when people have a little bit of knowledge, im lucky in that ive been a member of GURU 3D for over 15 years and there are some crazy knowledgeable people on there and some very interesting topics, the guy who wrote MSI Afterburner is a staff member and some top end private custom system builder are regular posters. For me DLSS 4 using Version K has improved the visuals of many games and obviously there is also a performance boost, other games to me look no different but DCS at 77% DLSS still looks amazing and smooth at Max settings and 4K is always over 100fps on a 9950x3d/4090@3ghz. Something like Ready Or Not looks no different, Metro EEE looks better i think. As for FG, maybe it looks better on CP2077 but on other games i have it off. AMD 3800x, Asrock 570X Taichi, 32GB Corsair Platinum, MSI 1080Ti, Corsair MP600 Gen 4 1TB NVMe. Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB NVMe, Samsung 860 1TB SSD, Custom Watercooling, AOC 32" 4K Screen.
Recommended Posts