MBot Posted Friday at 03:47 PM Posted Friday at 03:47 PM There might be a bug with WRCS Freeze/Reset. This excerpt is taken from the 347 TFW DOW New Information Pamphlet #24 Pave Spike: The underlined part does not work like that in DCS. After Freeze/Target Insert and then pressing Reset, the pod LOS will move and hold the position directly under the aircraft, not to the point that was freezed.
Zabuzard Posted Friday at 10:31 PM Posted Friday at 10:31 PM 6 hours ago, MBot said: There might be a bug with WRCS Freeze/Reset. This excerpt is taken from the 347 TFW DOW New Information Pamphlet #24 Pave Spike: The underlined part does not work like that in DCS. After Freeze/Target Insert and then pressing Reset, the pod LOS will move and hold the position directly under the aircraft, not to the point that was freezed. You are misunderstanding the quote. When you press RESET right while being above the VIP, it returns back to the VIP because its right under you. Pressing RESET will delete the memorized position and move back the WRCS target to the default position, being your own aircraft position. It helps to read the actual wiring diagrams and Maint Manuals if you need accurate descriptions of logic. Flight Manuals and especially pilot-writeups like this are not always precise enough and leave room for interpretation.
MBot Posted 19 hours ago Author Posted 19 hours ago 9 hours ago, Zabuzard said: You are misunderstanding the quote. When you press RESET right while being above the VIP, it returns back to the VIP because its right under you. I am sorry but this makes no sense whatsoever. How would you be able to press Freeze, Insert, Reset, then Insert again (note no prior Freeze) "and so on" while staying stationary over the VIP. I am not convinced.
Zabuzard Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 4 hours ago, MBot said: I am sorry but this makes no sense whatsoever. How would you be able to press Freeze, Insert, Reset, then Insert again (note no prior Freeze) "and so on" while staying stationary over the VIP. I am not convinced. Someone from the team will have a look. Could you share a track so its clearer what you are describing and easier to work with for the devs, that would be great There isnt much I can tell you right now during the weekend other than the documents you are using (and the source you got them from) had been used and consulted extensively during the development. Of course that doesnt exclude the chance of bugs, so someone will have a look at your query
Recommended Posts