Nascar Posted May 9 Posted May 9 How about a last call sale for those who missed out on a module? I would've bought the Mig-19 if I knew it wouldn't be available. 2 Thermaltake Core P90 Tempered Glass//Thermaltake iRGB Plus 1200W//GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS MASTER LGA 1151//i9-9900K//Thermaltake CL420 Copper Radiator//Thermaltake W4 Plus//Thermaltake 140mm Radiator Fan Triple Pack//Samsung 1TB 970 EVO NVMe M2//SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 500GB //CORSAIR Vengeance RGB Pro 64GB 3200//GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 TI//Logitech G940//Virpil MT50 Throttle//MFG Crosswind rudder pedals//Geko GSeat//Gametrix Jetseat//Htc Vive//Pimax 5k+//Viril VFX//Razer Nari Ultimate
Ramsay Posted May 9 Posted May 9 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Nascar said: How about a last call sale for those who missed out on a module? I would've bought the Mig-19 if I knew it wouldn't be available. Hardly seems fair as none of the sale price ATM goes to Razbam or the coders/artists who made the module(s). Edited May 9 by Ramsay 1 i9 9900K @4.8GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 11 Pro x64, Odyssey G93SC 5120X1440
Nascar Posted May 9 Author Posted May 9 They could make a deal, though. Positive waves. Thermaltake Core P90 Tempered Glass//Thermaltake iRGB Plus 1200W//GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS MASTER LGA 1151//i9-9900K//Thermaltake CL420 Copper Radiator//Thermaltake W4 Plus//Thermaltake 140mm Radiator Fan Triple Pack//Samsung 1TB 970 EVO NVMe M2//SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 500GB //CORSAIR Vengeance RGB Pro 64GB 3200//GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 TI//Logitech G940//Virpil MT50 Throttle//MFG Crosswind rudder pedals//Geko GSeat//Gametrix Jetseat//Htc Vive//Pimax 5k+//Viril VFX//Razer Nari Ultimate
Dragon1-1 Posted May 10 Posted May 10 That's exactly the opposite of what RAZABM seems to want. They took down the modules, not ED (well, ED physically did it, but at RAZBAM's request). If they wanted to make a deal, they would have done that already. 3 1
Darth Holliday Posted May 10 Posted May 10 Maybe, that is where you are led, to think that !!! I would have purchased it myself with some heads-up... 1
Timghetta Posted May 10 Posted May 10 7 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said: That's exactly the opposite of what RAZABM seems to want. They took down the modules, not ED (well, ED physically did it, but at RAZBAM's request). If they wanted to make a deal, they would have done that already. Please don't speculate with nonsense, thanks. 2 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] We take the Metal and bring it to Mesh
Dragon1-1 Posted May 10 Posted May 10 I'm not. ED clearly stated RAZBAM asked them to take down the modules. They also clearly stated (after people were complaining they were still selling RAZBAM modules) they were obliged to keep selling them until RAZBAM asked them to stop. There's no conspiracy, only Ron Zambrano posting reckless public statements about a private court case. If you did some research, it would have become fairly obvious. 4 1
draconus Posted May 13 Posted May 13 On 5/10/2025 at 6:45 PM, Dragon1-1 said: If you did some research, it would have become fairly obvious. Being one of the subcontractors he just might be privy to a bit more info. 1 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted May 13 ED Team Posted May 13 The RAZBAM modules were removed from sale after an official request by RAZBAM. Thank you Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Dragon1-1 Posted May 13 Posted May 13 5 hours ago, draconus said: Being one of the subcontractors he just might be privy to a bit more info. Might or might not (he's a subcontractor after all, not an employee), but he didn't seem to get the memo as to what @BIGNEWY's post above had just restated. Nothing I wrote is speculation, much less nonsense. Between the timing and Zambrano's statements, it's hard to conclude that either "positive waves" are nowhere near their list or priorities, or they're so incompetent at PR that their attempts at creating them are actually generating the exact opposite. Or both (Ron in particular seems a likely candidate for a "I suck at PR and I don't care" attitude).
Pipe Posted May 14 Posted May 14 On 5/9/2025 at 3:52 PM, Ramsay said: Hardly seems fair as none of the sale price ATM goes to Razbam or the coders/artists who made the module(s). RB needs their own store, like HB did 1 i7 4770k @ 4.5, asus z-87 pro, strix GTX 980ti directcu3oc, 32gb Kingston hyperX 2133, philips 40" 4k monitor, hotas cougar\warthog, track ir 5, Oculus Rift
Dallenbach Posted May 14 Posted May 14 vor 45 Minuten schrieb Pipe: RB braucht einen eigenen Laden, wie HB es getan hat https://www.razbamsimulationsllc.com/
Pipe Posted May 15 Posted May 15 12 hours ago, Dallenbach said: https://www.razbamsimulationsllc.com/ 12 hours ago, Dallenbach said: https://www.razbamsimulationsllc.com/ As far as I know they were not selling DCS modules from there, or were they? i7 4770k @ 4.5, asus z-87 pro, strix GTX 980ti directcu3oc, 32gb Kingston hyperX 2133, philips 40" 4k monitor, hotas cougar\warthog, track ir 5, Oculus Rift
Darth Holliday Posted May 15 Posted May 15 9 hours ago, Pipe said: As far as I know they were not selling DCS modules from there, or were they? I emailed them about a week ago and asked that very question...In typical fashion, they (he) never responded...They can go down in flames for all I care... 1
Czar66 Posted May 15 Posted May 15 14 hours ago, Pipe said: As far as I know they were not selling DCS modules from there, or were they? They were selling DCS modules there. It was also the main hub to get the manuals.
1BRAVO9 Posted Sunday at 09:00 PM Posted Sunday at 09:00 PM IMO it doesn't seem to be a very organized website. And I'm not bagging on RB, I love their modules. I think they make some of the best, if not the best, modules in the game.
Dragon1-1 Posted Monday at 10:56 PM Posted Monday at 10:56 PM (edited) Far from it. Their modules look nice, but feature-wise, they're behind the curve. Most notably, they're the only developer who decided to make a frontline two-seater without making an AI crewmember an integral part of their plan. This approach works for trainers, but that's because the second seat in those is for the instructor, whose main job is to teach the guy in front to fly the plane. In the Mudhen, the backseater is there precisely because you want one guy flying and the other handling the weapons. The WSO is an integral part of any real Mudhen crew. And despite that glaring omission, it's still better than the poor MiG-19, still unfinished in several areas, or the constantly under repair Harrier. If you want quality, look no further than Heatblur. They might be overdoing it with their dolled-up UI (really wish they stopped wasting time on bells and whistles), but the planes themselves are second to none. The AI backseater might not be the brightest bulb, but he's genuinely useful. Edited Monday at 10:58 PM by Dragon1-1 3
draconus Posted Tuesday at 06:01 AM Posted Tuesday at 06:01 AM 6 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said: If you want quality, look no further than Heatblur. Right, where's that quality in my Tomcat? Major gamebreaking bugs left for years, crawling development and maintenance since new cash cows showed up on the horizon, unrealistic implementations... Both ED, RAZABAM and HB create top notch modules - none is caring them well. About WSO - it was planned in later development and yes, it's needed and welcome. Contrary to the Tomcat though you don't actually require one to fly and fight, so players rarely miss him. 2 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Griefhard Posted Tuesday at 11:04 AM Posted Tuesday at 11:04 AM (edited) No point in buying RAZBAM modules, if they are not maintained. They will probably stop working at some point. So it is actuall good, that they are not for sale any more. And because this came from RAZBAM, I guess even they/he doesn't believe in settlement any more. Edited Tuesday at 11:05 AM by Griefhard
Dragon1-1 Posted Tuesday at 03:52 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:52 PM (edited) 9 hours ago, draconus said: Right, where's that quality in my Tomcat? Last time you were asked to elaborate on that, you produced a list of minor issues (no "major gamebreaking bugs" last time I flew it...), unfinished features and things that weren't even on HB. Let's face it, you're not exactly a trustworthy arbiter of quality, because your definition of "gamebreaking bug" seems to be "can't perform OBS BIT as per NATOPS". None of those modules are perfect. That doesn't mean HB doesn't have a better track record than RAZBAM at actually making their modules work like they should. Just look at the state the Harrier and MiG-19 are in, then at Tomcat and Viggen, and tell me which is more complete. It's true that HB should spend more time fixing bugs and less time embedding Chromium in DCS, but RAZBAM are much worse in that regard. Edited Tuesday at 03:54 PM by Dragon1-1 1
draconus Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM 4 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said: Last time you were asked to elaborate on that, you produced a list of minor issues (no "major gamebreaking bugs" last time I flew it...), unfinished features and things that weren't even on HB. You confused bugs list with unrealistic features. And tell me if inability to see LANTIRN or TCS as a pilot is not game breaking. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Dragon1-1 Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM Ah, that. It's not exactly "left for years", seeing as it seems to have appeared since the MT build came out, and not everyone gets it. TBF, this looks like a difficult bug to fix (hard to diagnose something that doesn't happen on your test build...). I should also note that it's a single bug, and the only one real gamebreaker, at least if you're not one of those for whom it goes away after mission reload.
draconus Posted yesterday at 07:08 AM Posted yesterday at 07:08 AM 5 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said: I should also note that it's a single bug, and the only one real gamebreaker, at least if you're not one of those for whom it goes away after mission reload. Not gonna go back and forth on whose bug is uglier. There are more, not only module but also their missions and campaigns. The point was both ED, RAZBAM and HB can do very good modules but I cringe and react that it's somehow HB considered "quality" developer. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Dragon1-1 Posted yesterday at 09:36 AM Posted yesterday at 09:36 AM I consider the bar for "quality developer" to be somewhere between RAZBAM and ED. HB surpasses both when it comes to accuracy (one thing RAZBAM is known to play fast and loose with), visuals and features. All of them have bugs, sometimes bad, and a lot of those that are merely annoying, but again, compare the MiG-19 and the Harrier to any ED module and you'll see the difference. 1
Recommended Posts