Rules of Engagement, anyone?

[graveyard4DCS]

In one of the earlier missions I shared in DCS User Files, I tried to incorporate elements of the Rules of Engagement (ROE). The goal was to enhance the sense of realism and authenticity in mission design.

I’m interested in hearing your perspective: do you think that procedural elements like ROE contribute meaningfully to immersion? Or do they tend to be seen as purely cosmetic, barely read and quickly forgotten?

Note:

• If you're new to the concept of ROE (Rules of Engagement) that was included in this mission, you can start with a first introduction here.
• If you're already familiar with the concept, then you might be interested in how NATO structures its ROE using a specific numbering system.

Edited July 14 by graveyard4DCS

[Phantom711]

Definitely a nice addition for those who seek more realism and immersion.

Your A/G ROE with regards to attack headings is very specific. You could generalize it a bit more, like „Every attempt should be made IOT avoid or minimize collateral damage, to include appropriate selection of employed ordnance, fuze settings and attack direction.“