SA22 Pantsir wont shoot above ~32,000ft ceiling

[Max107]

I've even set him to Excellent and played with the Advanced waypoints options - nothing.
his max range ceiling is supposed to be around 45,000ft~50,000ft

SA22 max shooting range.trk

[Minsky]

1 hour ago, Max107 said:

his max range ceiling is supposed to be around 45,000ft~50,000ft

 

I wouldn't trust Wikipedia on that without cross-checking with other sources.

https://missilethreat.csis.org/defsys/pantsir-s-1/

Quote

Using 57E6 missiles, the Pantsir-S1 can engage tactical aircraft at a maximum range of 20 km and altitude of 10 km

 

[Max107]

58 minutes ago, Minsky said:

 

I wouldn't trust Wikipedia on that without cross-checking with other sources.

https://missilethreat.csis.org/defsys/pantsir-s-1/

 

Appreciate your respectful assumption, however:

https://armamentresearch.com/russian-96k6-pantsir-s1-air-defence-system-in-ukraine/

 

Quote

"57E6 missiles have a maximum range of 20 kilometres and maximum altitude of 15 kilometres"

 https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/exclusive-technical-review-pantsir-sm-the-latest-generation-in-russias-air-defense-system

 

Quote

"This is a significant improvement over the Pantsir-S1, which could only engage targets at a range of 1,200 to 20,000 meters (1.2 to 20 kilometers) and at altitudes of 15 to 15,000 meters"

06:40

 

[Minsky]

23 minutes ago, Max107 said:

Appreciate your respectful assumption, however:

Yeah, and also:

https://www.deagel.com/weapons/57e6-e/a000921

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/pantsyr.htm

Do we have any confirmed hits at 15 km?

Because all these sources - both yours and mine - are just making assumptions and educated guesses without citing anyone in particular or referencing any hard data.

Seems like the author (Currenthill) went with the more conservative numbers.

[Dragon1-1]

The 15km figure might be the theoretical best case from some marketing materials, 10km is probably more realistic against a possibly maneuvering target. Remember that aside from the missile's kinematics, a SAM crew would not engage anything at the very edge of its envelope, because even a small maneuver could take the target out of it, thrashing the missile. Or, look at it that way: if the missile is good up to 15km max, then launching at 10km at most will ensure it won't be evaded by simply zooming up.

[Max107]

1 hour ago, Minsky said:

Yeah, and also:

https://www.deagel.com/weapons/57e6-e/a000921

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/pantsyr.htm

Do we have any confirmed hits at 15 km?

Because all these sources - both yours and mine - are just making assumptions and educated guesses without citing anyone in particular or referencing any hard data.

Seems like the author (Currenthill) went with the more conservative numbers.

Keep posting links to various websites is not an answer but a guess game, surly not better than wikipedia..
thank you for your effort of trying answering anyway

47 minutes ago, Dragon1-1 said:

The 15km figure might be the theoretical best case from some marketing materials, 10km is probably more realistic against a possibly maneuvering target. Remember that aside from the missile's kinematics, a SAM crew would not engage anything at the very edge of its envelope, because even a small maneuver could take the target out of it, thrashing the missile. Or, look at it that way: if the missile is good up to 15km max, then launching at 10km at most will ensure it won't be evaded by simply zooming up.

How many targets can actually maneuver effectively enough above 30,000ft?
Maybe you're right about the marketing thing..

Still would love to get an answer from ED or [CH] just to know the actual reason:)
 

[Dragon1-1]

13 minutes ago, Max107 said:

How many targets can actually maneuver effectively enough above 30,000ft?

Just about anything powered by jets, if going reasonably fast. Many aircraft we have can go up to 40kft. It doesn't take much to thrash a missile launched at the very edge of its kinematic profile. Literally any change will do. That the missile can be launched straight up and get up to 15km doesn't mean that it'll be left with enough energy for a meaningful endgame. It's just like range figures from marketing brochures, which are either flyout range or even worse, range against a target closing at supersonic speeds.

Edited 7 hours ago by Dragon1-1

[Max107]

4 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:

Just about anything powered by jets, if going reasonably fast. Many aircraft we have can go up to 40kft. It doesn't take much to thrash a missile launched at the very edge of its kinematic profile. Literally any change will do. That the missile can be launched straight up and get up to 15km doesn't mean that it'll be left with enough energy for a meaningful endgame. It's just like range figures from marketing brochures, which are either flyout range or even worse, range against a target closing at supersonic speeds.

just wanna clarify that my core question in this post refers to the absolute ceiling point of the engagement dome of the system (SA22 in this case).
I'm not talking about being "max ceiling + 5miles away", but flying directly over the dome of the Pantsir.

With that said, discussions about jet capabilities with no details of the mission/threats/goals is not relevant..
Not many jets can preform good above 30k ft when carrying 'stuff' on their wings.


 

 

[The Stick]

The S2 will engage - I've had to climb out above Angels 40 numerous times even when within the outer limits of their engagement envelope. Once I do, the missiles will lose inertia and fall away. At 30K its a little too close for comfort - too slow and I'm toast. End of the day, Pantsirs are better deployed as point defence systems if I understand correctly.