Lava Posted October 4, 2009 Posted October 4, 2009 (edited) There's a survivable crash, and then there's a crash you can walk away from. BS currently doesn't model the trauma to the pilot from an incredibly violent crash. Instead the copter explodes. Hey, maybe you got thrown free and survived with 50% of your body burned and spent the next year in the hospital and the rest of your life crippled! Or maybe you got thrown onto the stick, or the HUD shattered and glass flew in your face, or debris slashed open your chest. Instead of ED modeling all that, I'm happy with the compromise of exploding the chopper when, in real life, they'd say "This chopper is completely useless for us now." You can think it's 'survivable' all you want. Ask yourself, though, how many real life pilots would have ejected earlier, fearing for their lives? Or perhaps not even pulled that maneuver in the first place :) All it takes is one bad injury and you can never fly in the armed forces again. Think of it as "BOOM! No SANE pilot would have pushed it this far, and this is too unpredictable to accurately say if you will survive or not!" edit: Perhaps the most fundamental reason the game doesn't have more accurate crashes: Where would you get the data from? How do you know it's accurate? You'd need a lot of data to put together an accurate helicopter crash model. A poster above pointed that out in a joking format. Edited October 4, 2009 by Lava
BlackFallout Posted October 5, 2009 Author Posted October 5, 2009 Ok guys point taken, but look at this. This happened to me today and I found this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMU_vxFGd8A&feature=related KA50 smash's into ground with no rotors but does not explode?
Lava Posted October 5, 2009 Posted October 5, 2009 I wonder if it didn't explode because it broke in two on impact? That sure looked like an explosion coming when it was plummeting from 400 meters @ 270 KPH :)
RobC Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 (edited) I found this one while i was looking at a bunch of the related youtube vids (anyone know the story behind this?) I'm pretty sure its a Puma And I got a good laugh out of the one BlackFallout just posted, I think thats happened to me before as well :D. Edited October 6, 2009 by RobC
BlackFallout Posted October 6, 2009 Author Posted October 6, 2009 I found this one while i was looking at a bunch of the related youtube vids (anyone know the story behind this?) I'm pretty sure its a Puma And I got a good laugh out of the one BlackFallout just posted, I think thats happened to me before as well :D. Looks like the tail rotor nipped the ground and caused a loss of tail rotor authority.
Doc. Caliban Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 Whenever I have a premature explosion, I just say, "Sorry baby, it happens to all guys. It's just poor damage modeling." On a serious note, the OP has a point, and no matter what your *personal* feelings are on the importance of the issue, it's still valid. Trying to invalidate it by saying, 'It doesn't bother *me*' is of no value in the thread, really. My lest favorite kind of answer in a forum thread is, "Why would you want to do *that*?" Just my 2 cents. [ Asus Rampage II Extreme | Intel i7 920 @ 3.6GHz| 12GB DDR3 | 3-Way SLI (3x GTX280OC 1GB) | 300GB Raptor | SupremeFX X-Fi 7.1 audio | 1,200W Thermaltake Toughpower PSU | 30" LCD @ 2560x1600 | Thrustmaster HOTAS Cougar | TrackIR 5 | CoolerMaster HFC 332 case ]
sinelnic Posted October 6, 2009 Posted October 6, 2009 Here. If you find the damage modelling in this track "not good enough", then fine. Best viewed from F3 view.Beautiful crash.trk Westinghouse W-600 refrigerator - Corona six-pack - Marlboro reds - Patience by Girlfriend "Engineering is the art of modelling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyse so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance." (Dr. A. R. Dykes - British Institution of Structural Engineers, 1976)
Recommended Posts