Squid Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 Which one you prefer (if you do) and what are for you the advantages and disadvantages of each :) . i7 880 | HD 7870 | 8 Gb DDR3 1600 | ECS P55H-A | OCZ Vertex 2 180 | Intel 330 180 | WD 500 AAKS | 2x WD 2T Green | Enermax Liberty 620 | CH Combatstick & Throttle | TrackIR 3 | HP ZR24W | Windows 7 x64
Boberro Posted November 18, 2010 Posted November 18, 2010 LOMAC: Really next Flanker arcade in new graphics. Huge hardware requirements, bad performance. LO:FC Big step ahead compared to basic LOMAC. Better performance, more realistic, new great airfraft with detailed FM. StarForce. It says for itself. LO2: Much better than LO:FC. Corrected many bugs, more stable. Quite well optimized, it works even on my rusty PC. It is the best Lock on ever released. This is version which I only play. Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Recommended Posts