cmeliak
-
Posts
130 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by cmeliak
-
-
BSpike, thanks a lot. It really works.
ED should probably disable possibility to check out these planes
-
hi guys
i just bought Nevada yesterday so installed 2.0.4 and wanna have a fun, but:
- my mission editor doesn't starts
- multiplayer doesn't starts
- no instant missions ... anything
loading screen pops up everytime but nothing happens.
task manager show no activity, no cpu, no RAM activity ...
- repair went without issues
- DX is OK
- MS libraries reinstalled
any ideas here?
thanks and cheers
-
adding this fanclub, me262 is my favorite one.
-
definitelly MiG 25
we have enough su27 and mig29 here. Lets try a new plane, well rocket/almost space craft actually.
-
no sorry. i have thrustmaster warthog. it doesn't looks like joy problem but some software bug. not sure about.
-
Hi
my problem is visible from the movie here
I start and after couple of seconds my stick doesn't auto center even if I don't push/pull joystick anymore. This bug is very strange, aircraft not flyable for me. It comes very randomly, no system behind.
thank you for you ideas.
cmeliak
-
Gents,
I am about to sell couple of instruments for a L39C, all brand new. I have an instrument dials, cover glass, instrument frames.... couple of things. All genuine L39C. Is there a general interest?? My contact person should bring me some until end of this month so I will put some pictures here and probably establish some eshop or something like this.
Cheers
cmeliak
-
Gents,
i am curious about Xeon CPUs. These has lower frequencies but xeon system bus has much higher data flow.
Example:
Xeon E5-2620v3 (2.4 GHz) -> system bus=8GT/s, memory bw=59GB/s
i7-5557u (3.4 GHz) -> system bus=5GT/s, memory bw =25.6GB/s
My questions:
1. can DCS use Xeon instructions to compute equations faster?
2. if not, is there any DCS optimization for specific CPU type
Thank you guys
cmeliak
-
Hey guys, is there any progress with 262 there? Just few pictures please ...
-
Hey gents
does anybody knows if they plan to implement trim as axis or do I have to assign 20 keyboard buttons to get my plane comfortable flying ...:joystick:
thanx
cmeliak
-
Thank you joey45
That is confirmation for my excpectation. Will try...
-
Hey guys,
I've got 1.2.6.20768.297 currently. Would like to update so started updater and nothing happens....
Next logical step is to download complete instalation and reinstall, that means uninstall 1.2.6., but I am not sure what happens with my module licenses, I have P51 and FC3.
Do i need to spend another activation point??? I did not changed computer, it is just update ...
thank you for your support.
cmeliak
-
From what I heard from my colleagues, who have tried this thing - it is just a big toy.
G-effects imitation is very far from reality - it is simply impossible to reproduce the positive or negative overload on this device. The feelings is so far from a real flight, so this device can only be used for entertainment.
Sorry, guys...
try to compare it with wooden chair you've got at home ... :)
I think this big toy is dream of everybody here in this forum .... i would not complain to have it at home.:D
-
http://en.kb-tk.ru/production/fly-motion.html#more
Looks like same design but differs some from first post
Sells for +25000 Euro :-)
Guess they can have some financial space for a TM WH
yes, it lloks like it is the device. it takes only 4kW :), not that much.
-
That plus a good res rift would be the ultimate puke everywhere simulator!
I want.
You are right, but after all this years in front of my screen I am still missing multicore support for this nice simulator. It is topic for another thread ...
It looks like they use telemetry or some kind of wirelles data transfer. Should not be that complicated. To weld a frame together is not that big issue, then you need some servo motors and drivers... ok, possible. But then, somebody has to spend milion hours on lua programming ... hmm.
It sounds like project for couple of months/years :) ?
-
awsome, is there any company producing there devices?
-
:)
-i really can not evaluate how realistic it is ... let the pilots talking ....
-additional weapons .... definitelly YES
-core based system ??? never seen 100% in the cpu bar in my task manager .... what is wrong???
- new sound engine ... definitelly YES
- A10,P51??? unfortunatelly nothing 4 me ... fly RUS planes
- DCS environment??? do i need??? compatibility with BS?? do I need?? - i would say that in comparison to flanker is possibility to fly over internet with several frineds much better feature than dcs enviro.
I do not say that it is bad, i say: i would like real multicore support to use my cpu to 100% ... and i am tired of waiting ... sorry for that ... try to search first posts about this topic ... it is several years ago ....
-
fact is that i am not daily up to date ... this is fact...
i am observing it since ... i do not remember any more. ... and what are the changes in the last years???? almost nothing ... but licensing concept and "pay for each aircraft" concept is really very good developed ....
sorry for that but i just started the first lock on .... and dcs package .... what is added value ??? please tell me what is difference/improvement for mig29 or su27???? hmmm do you know this http://www.mobygames.com/game/su-27-flanker ?? graphics?? trackir support ??? definitelly yes... we could discuus about so called "flight model" ... i have no experience with real flight so I can not contribute.... but just try the older one too, to feel the difference.
have a fun ...
(sorry, may be i have a bad day)
-
may be, but for me is much more important to have a simulator with multicore support.
such a kind of simulator will be able to compute much larger environment with more vehicles, planes, explosions and so on. 64bit architecture gives better possibility to store textures, recording movies...
-
Windows solitaire will become x64 and multicore support sooner than this simulator .... i lost all my hope after all this years of waiting....
-
Hi,
may I ask which card do you plan to use to drive instruments/gauges servomotors? You likes to use Futaba servos?
Or is just a LUA interface enough?
THX
cmeliak
-
This is definitelly great news ... :pilotfly:
I am keen on to start it, looking forward on the January.
-
very nice work
-
Oakes,
Thank you for explanation. Time to eBay shop. :thumbup:
I plan use Mjoy16 (DIY) circuit, or maybe BU0836.
I have two Mjoy16 and one BU0836.
Sokol1
I have been about to build Mjoy16, but if you buy bu0836 you can save money and it is just done. No work, and this baby works fine.
mission or mission editor wont start
in Game Crash
Posted
To remove that planes is logical idea.
I have FC3 and full P51D module so I don't need it, but ok. Understood
Will not to remove it anymore