Okay!-
Well hey, since you have zero regard whatsoever for other player's feelings and opinions, there is perhaps no chance you will hear this at all. Let alone care enough about your fellow players (to which there are very few in this genre). But I digress! Let me state there have been MULTIPLE, and I mean MULTIPLE examples (that are much more inhibiting than "petty" as you so inaccurately state. This is the lack of polish that tarnish Black Shark's name. Errors, such as complete inaccuracies along with small misspellings in not only the Pilots Manual, but the GUI Manual as well. Providing reference screenshots as well as dedicating sections to things that aren't even THERE in your game's manual it's more notable than you seem to realize. It's something that is inhibiting enough to block learning. Don't try to say learning in this game isn't important because when you do I will call you out on it flat. I won't say that I haven't got a fantastic value for the $40 I spent on this. It was worth my money. Yet, when you fail to spend money for someone to spell-check the manual for the price of "a couple of pizzas", how can you expect someone to not state that flaw? Even misspelling "astounding" wouldn't be meritorious enough to garner criticism from me - it is the simple failure to remove a few paragraphs here and there that describe objects or elements that _do not exist_ anymore.
Your criticism falls flat on it's face when you analyze both the fact that: You're using excuses of "difficulty" to cover up a developer's fault (I'm sorry boss, but I didn't do the job you're paying me for because it was just a little bit too hard for me). Not to mention the ridiculous idea that I garner some sort of prejudice against Russians makes me wonder why you're so touchy about that notion. Could you point out please what part of my discussion made you come to that conclusion? Right. You can't. Because it doesn't exist.
Don't get on your high horse by thinking you're doing some sort of justice to the "Eagle Dynamics" or "Black Shark" name by defending things that make the game and developers look bad. What you seem intent on doing has the opposite effect. You not only make yourself and the person you're defending look incompetent but prevent progress of the contributing parties as a whole. I'm utterly stupefied to actually see this sort of knee-jerk defense reaction from anybody on these forums.
To Eagle Dynamics: I would gladly spend some of my free time editing out those portions of your manual and spell-checking it if you would be willing to distribute it.