Ned-Ita

I tested the ALQ-184L jammer on the A-10CII against the TOR M2 [CH], the result is quite surprising since the ECM is able to break the SAMs' locks. (very interesting feature) The SAM also seems more susceptible to ECM in general as it reduces the engagement distance when compared to other SAMs. The TOR [ED] does not seem to follow this logic. I report this characteristic because it does not appear to be in line with the other SAMs in the game. The updated SAM is more susceptible to ECM than the previous version. Repro steps: I fly toward Tor M2 I wait for RWR to signal the launch. I turn on the ECM Result: The Tor M2 [CH] does not behave under ECM like other DCS SAMs. Jem_TM2_test.trk

DCS Nickname: 512 | {527} Ned Discord Nickname: Ned-Ita Faction: Blue Group: 527th Aggressor Squadron Modules: -

As requested: Best regards, NED ED TEST.trk

Sorry, I just realized I put the post in the wrong section. I created another one in the correct section. If you agree I would delete this post to avoid confusion. If you like and want, I invite you to re-enter your considerations in the new post. Regarding your considerations, I agree with you that things are certainly related. As you wrote the rate of climb would seem very out of parameter. For my tests you can assume a DI ~=150 200. The optimal climb speed is linked to the DI, in this case I calculated that the optimal should be around 0.82. In any case it is irrelevant, as long as the aircraft does not climb with an AoA higher than 6°, it should always be able to reach the optimal altitude. Best regards, NED EDIT1: Ignore the first part, a moderator must have helped me. EDIT2: When I wrote the post I was away from home and I was remembering, the DI for the configuration is ~=200.

I tried to reach optimal altitude in F-16, as displayed in ICP ( see screenshot), and i wasn't able to. Repro steps: Loadout any DI >100 (see screenshot) Take off, Full military Climb 365 CAS UP TO 0.82 M I try to keep 0.82 M as long I could while climbing I reach maximum altitude (Celling) before the indicated optimal altitude. Compare current altitude with opt altitude in ICP. I suspect it might depend on increased induced drag from last version. Best regards, NED