Vamp

The fact that you can literally go and ask one side any question you want and get a detailed response that is both straight to the point and coherent with the full picture they provide. On the other side you got pretty much nothing and constant signs of both vagueness and avoidance. Yet somehow I'm meant to believe that the first side is actively engaging in an anti consumer behaviour just because "you wouldn't get it and there's a hidden contractual thing that makes them unprofessional" that apparently only applies to one side that can't even get their statements together. I'm really starting to wonder if it's just a smoke and mirrors tactic especially when we're talking about companies that not that not so long ago used to made deals through a WhatsApp chat. How am I as a consumer that is going to lose their EA dream aircraft ment to somehow believe that every single thing which was laid out by RBs side, containing of some of the best in scene talent that has been left out to dry and financially and mentally pushed out of the scene, giving me in depth info about the entire BTS process and how it's now completely over, is a total lie without any proof claiming otherwise but some flash words.

I don't get it. We've got one side saying it's completely over, giving heads up on the situation throughout the conflict and giving a full on explanation to most important details of the agreements both past and the most recent one mentioned yesterday, being open to community questions and literally showing receipts for being ready to cooperate instantly and share the updates and escrow. The other side is hiding behind supposed confidentiality, dodging every single in-depth question and even deleting their own statements from social media, sharing messages that contradict each other and dropping their main claim which I don't think anyone believe by now with all that IP infringement trouble.

No emotion in that. Just a clarification. Post I was referring to lacks context and states that lack of the support to the modules is RBs decision supposedly made on a whim ,which if true, would be considered a vicious decision.

Quoted post is an answer to a previous one stating that RB essentially doesn't support their modules right now out of vicious choice as they still would be capable to do it with full access to the required tools. It's just a correction and it even says that the point of it is not to question the decision making on the topic from either party.