julpeuz

He might be new (and I kind of am myself), still his points remain valid.

This is indeed infuriating seing nothing happening or communicated. I modified myself the default.lua files to get the proper bindings we should have had from the beginning. I know nothing in lua, just asked chatGPT. It was all done in less than an hour. I wonder what’s taking them so long.

Many thanks for the beautiful work, can’t wait for it to come live. Just a little remark, the pillars are off for the Chelsea Bridge

Hi guys, many thanks for the very good mod. Will it still be valid for the upcoming Normandy 2 revamp ?

Hi guys, Would it be possible to make some of the US units that also served in Europe common with the original WW2 assets pack ? Not an expert on which ship served where, but I always found a bit weird having only Samuel Chase on D-Day missions. And I know for having asked to the concerned campaign makers that adding yet another assets pack required to play a campaign will not be considered given the added paywall. Thanks for considering.

@Graphics what happened to the Iowa battleship stated on the 7th of February Newsletter ? Has it been removed from your plans ?

I can’t help but thinking ED waited to see the success of the Corsair before expanding their plans for the pacific assets pack and the flyable zero. So I guess the Corsair did well sales wise, that’s great news.

I first read the newsletter, I couldn’t believe it. So grateful, thank you ED. Can’t wait to see how immersive this all will be. So glad for the full fidelity zero, and very pleasantly surprised by the AI P38. Maybe flyable one day ?

Great post, and I agree it’s exaggerated as it is. To me it feels like the flutter should occur when side slipping, in which case the « improper alignment » would indeed kick in, the mast being at an AoA. Maybe link its behavior to the ball being centered or not, the speed being at a certain speed onward ? Would be a great cue as a visual piloting reference too.

Very nice video, and the English translation sounds very good to me. Even though I find their stuff very exciting, I find it almost a little frightening seeing Winwings flooding the market with all of their fancy stuff. Not sure how the other brands will compete in the near future.

Hey guys I’m just raising a question, and I got plenty of good answers that I accept, no need to be mean and sarcastic. I don’t pretend to be a zero expert either, and would be very happy to have a flyable one. Chill down

One thing I’m questioning about having a flyable zero, is who is actually gonna buy it, and play it multiplayer ? Given it’s underwhelming performances against both the Corsair and Hellcat in pretty much every aspects except low speed turns

Wow thank you so much for taking the time to explain. I tried the way you describe, but from what I understood from the Virpil built in graph, it actually does the opposite : The logical axis travels from 0 to 50% when moving the physical axis from 0 to 100%. But I didn’t tried in game so I may have misunderstood the graphs. I don’t have my computer on hand until a few weeks now, I’ll try again when I get it back. Thanks again.

Thanks for the answer, but I mean the potentiometer axis, not the digital encoders.

Hi guys, I have a control panel 1, and I’d like to split one of the rotary knob axis into two separate axis : 1 axis from 0 to 50% of the physical position, and another one from 50 to 100%. So I can control the fluorescent lighting of the cockpit on one side, and the normal cockpit lighting on the other side. But so far no luck. Is that even possible ? thanks in advance.