LostOblivion
-
Posts
777 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by LostOblivion
-
-
No - you have to manually adjust your eyepoint position. There's a guide around here somewhere, and I asked this specific question some time ago, to which I received a meaningful reply linking the guide - my reply isn't as helpful.
However, I do remember (FTMP) how to do it. First you hit R-Shift and R-CTRL PLUS your KP Arrow keys, 2,4,6,8 to go down, left, right, up, respectively. RSHFT+RCTRL+ KP (-) and KP (*) move you out and in IIRC. THEN, MOST IMPORTANTLY, you MUST hit RALT+ KP (0) to get it to save your eyepoint position.
Sometimes you have to go out and then come back into the cockpit to activate it...at least I have experienced this on occasion. It also remembers your eyepoint by plane when you save it correctly.
GL! :pilotfly:
That sounds like a lot of hassle! Luckily, ED just said they're improving the VR interface in DCS, which probably means it'll be easier to setup and use in DCS. :)
-
I think what he ment was that people are over-expecting things.
-
I haven't played DCS for ages, mostly because I think nothing's really happening to the core gameplay. Sure, there have been many exciting aircraft to try out, but I am only flying them in the same dull gameplay environment as before. Exciting things that used to come regularly have stagnated and the excuse is EDGE. It's a good excuse, but until then, I have no joy in playing DCS.
-
You don't have to uninstall. Just move the DCS folder and make a symbolic link to it.
Copy the folder to where you want, then hit the Windows start menu, type "cmd", hit enter, then type the following.
mklink /D "OldPath" "NewPath"
(Swap with the old path and the new path, and keep the double quotes around it...)
Now Windows, DCS updater, and everything else will think your DCS install is in the same place as it used to, but it's really on the SSD.
-
Thank you for the clarification! :)
-
-
yap..there is nothing wrong with the X52 (I have the X52 Pro)...best money to value ratio...and yes..the TMWH seems to be way better, but it is also way more expensive
What he said.
-
The X52 is a great start. Of course, anyone owning the HOTAS Warthog would say it is better for DCS, but of course it is, it is also more expensive. The X52 is a great stick for most simmers. Also it has a twisting rudder, which saves you from buying rudder pedals until you decide to upgrade. (The TMHW has no twist rudder.)
Sensors are not so bad on the X52, it's just that you can feel a big difference when upgrading to a higher end stick like the TMHW.
-
[...] satisfactory resolution [...]
Apparently, Studio Beczl has given Leatherneck Simulations, a brand new company, the permission to continue developing the product and release it. I would say that this, getting what you backed to start with, is a satisfactory resolution.
What would you rather have, beczl sitting on the product not releasing, giving you refunds, or him letting someone else actually release the product. You're still getting what you backed.
Lost
-
Leatherneck Simulations...terrible name! Lol!
Once I saw your awesome logo, the name fit, and I was calmed down considerably! :)
Congrats on getting things worked out guys,but I gotta say Leatherneck is a terrible name. A company named after US Marines but your first few aircraft will be Russian?What now? Leatherneck is unambiguously synonymous with US Marines? Lots of army squads call themselves "The Leathernecks", even in Norway. I'm sure there are Russians calling themselves leathernecks. It really is a generic name!
I feel sorry that it had to come to this, but sometimes difficult decisions have to be made in a business. Initially I was sorry for beczl. It could seem he was ousted from his position, but I'm glad if he was the one making the decision to leave.
Let us not forget that he is certainly a brilliant product developer and authentic modeller. He must love what he does, and I hope he is not afraid to continue making his brilliant add-ons and content for the community.
Without both beczl and Novak this product would never have seen the light of day. I don't think us backers should be angry about what happened regarding IngieGoGo. The funds were certainly put to good use, and the product might not have come this far without it. Do not be angry about having supported what you believed in, because it got the project to where it is today. :)
I wish all the best to new the team! (Or rather, same team, but with a new name!)
Lost
- 1
-
Leatherneck Simulations...terrible name! Lol!
- 1
-
ED have probably streamlined a bit how 3rd party addons are interfacing with the rest of the game. Good news for me! :)
-
This is silly.
-
I had exactly the same problem as you, and I solve it with symbolic links.
Move your installation, then:
mklink /D oldpath newpath
Cheers
-
Didn't ED mention they were making an up-to-scratch cockpit for the T, or is it out yet?
-
They will go back to 1.2.7.23097+++ after the meta update.
-
It is an update to the updater. Kind of a meta-update.
-
Great! This really boosted my morale after that horrible mistake beczl did last week.
-
Good reading.
Surely EDGE features a planet and not merely a projected map?:huh:
-
It's no such plane Su-25A. It's Su-25.
I'd love to fly with others interested in rus air frames.
-
The easiest solution is to buy a new keyboard. I'm a professional programmer, avid gamer, and I paid around £ 5 for my keyboard, and I probably replaced it about 5 times...
-
I think he means if he can replace ground and building textures with green so that he can only see his aircraft on whatever he wishes. Like a green screen behind your aircraft.
-
It's not working because I'm downloading at 12 MB/s. :)
-
You bought A-10C? Not just A-10A?
No "slow zoom in" when mission starts
in DCS Core Wish List
Posted
At least make it so that the zoom axis can stop it.