Jump to content

Yellonet

Members
  • Posts

    1947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Yellonet

  1. I log into the game with my store account (which was already entered) but I have none of my modules active, how do I fix this?

     

    Also, the view is shifted upwards about 1/4 screen height, so I can't see the top 1/4 of the image, and I can't find any options.... what's going on?

     

    Edit: View problem solved, Alt+Enter to get to full screen, then changed the resolution which was set for my old screen, now I can get to the option button (had forgotten it was at the top of the screen).

     

    But I cannot log into the module manager "no internet connection"...

     

    EDIT 2: Modules are working now, probably only servers that were under a bit of stress before.

  2. 1. Yes, but likely only for high fidelity projects

    2. No.

    2b. For MiG-21 it seemed like it would be made anyway so I didn't feel like I needed to pledge. For the F-35 I just have no interest in that aircraft, I want used and proven aircraft that could realistically (and somewhat fairly) be pitted against each other in historical or hypothetical scenarios.

    3. Renders, model inside game, working systems. Seeing is believing.

    4. It really would depend on the modelled aircraft and how much I believed in it being properly made, but my max pledge would probably be around $50.

  3. Then you do have an opinion on the matter. It's allowed. You believe that due to the lack of systems complexity, it's not as "deep" and should therefore cost less. No need to be passive aggressive here, state what you think. Don't argue without arguing, take your stance.

    Not really. But when I do have an opinion about something I don't hold back, you don't have to worry about that ;)

     

    My rebuttal to what you won't say is this: Consider that even though the cockpit might not have the whiz-bang avionics of the A-10C, but the flight model itself is worth the price for most of us. Just because you don't find value in that, doesn't mean that no one else should or will. If you don't think that it's worth it, don't buy it.

    Please, don't put words in my mouth.

    When did I say that I prefer the Warthog over the Huey?

    When did I say that I don't find value in a good flight model?

     

    My comment about the pricing of the UH-1H was a response to a response of my post where I guessed that the new modules would be $40. The guy responding to me wrote that it was the same price as A-10C but with only a fraction of the content.

    I then responded with the price of the UH-1H and stating that that module also has less content than the A-10C, thus showing that module content does not have a direct impact on module pricing.

     

    So, whatever you think, I don't really have an opinion on the pricing strategy. But I would be surprised if the F-15C and Su-27S modules ends up as cheap as $10-$15 like some people seems to think is fair.

  4. So you think price should be based on the complexity/vintage of the aircraft then?

    I don't really have an opinion on the matter. I'm just stating what I know, the Huey cost $50, although it's arguably less advanced, and as such should take less time to develop than a fighter aircraft that has computers, other advanced systems and radar.

×
×
  • Create New...