Jump to content

TuAFScythe

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TuAFScythe

  1. Unfortunately update is finished after several tries. So now because there is no new update I can not reproduce the issue, sorry.
  2. Actually I tried adsl line and mobile 3g also, but they are basically same company. Let me try http.
  3. Everything double checked and even listed as trusted I put all dcs exe's as exception but same result. Even event logger says just application error. Can this be a result because of ISP ? Because I think dcs_updater can not succesfully use UDP.
  4. I see some similiar topics but none of them are very clear about the issue so I'm opening a new topic. Every time updater starts downloading it crashes and I have to restart it again. But for 3gb it is getting boring. I'm pasting log but as you could see main issue seems to be "ERROR: torrent: UDP error: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host from: 0.0.0.0" . I dont know what that means, but kaspersky completely disabled, no firewall is active, even dcs deleted and reinstalled again.
  5. So back again flying low between hills, crashing when trying to fly downslope heights(bug ?), firing R-27's to "shoot'n run" away planes(I thought Su-27 has higher W/T ratio but F-15C has much climb ability that bugs me, damn aerodynamics)... bla bla bla like I love being a whiner, yessss.
  6. Data link is only Awacs and EW sided it is only mission based. To be preceise I dont want to face an eagle in a relatively flat region with long ranges. It is like facing AI in SERIOUS difficulty.
  7. This man has a point, exaggerated but true for some aspects. Real life Su-27 and R-27R-ER-T-ET probably worse than we know and only thing we have against F-15s is Mig-29 with cucumber like radar, low ferry range and low payload(Damn even she doesnt have the ability of tracking 2 targets simultaneously). As for Su-33, a cheap imitation of Su-27 and playing with these planes become like bed fantasies. But, hey dont worry Flanker and Fulcrum lovers we can still get drop on them with creeping between mountains, except if they didn't add ground penetrating, AESA radar for F-15C :)
  8. No that does not explain that. Missile burnt gases moving horizontally, but missile is likely have a 30-45 degrees deviation from horizon. It can be explained by either missile has thrust vectoring or a very ugly graphical glitch. Missile guidence delay won't effect flight characteristics dramatically but at those altitudes if missile wants(considering it is a R-27 we should also take account that it might want to go forward forever because of piece of crap radar of Su-27) to go forward, it has to raise its nose with high AoA but flames should allinged with the axis of missile at that position, of course a little bit to horizontally back but not all as the picture shows. Like this cruise missile launch, not same example but relatively slow speed of missile(experiencing high AoA) just after launch, and it tries to change its direction quickly. Try to look tilted 90 degrees to left
  9. I dont want to discuss anything about FC3 which is disappointing like FC2(that I bought anyways) and I will probably buy it like I did with FC2. Only one thing please just remove that picture of Su-27 firing an advance flight modelled R-27ER(R,ET,T whatever it is) which looks like trying to do a deceiving cobra maneuver(well if you add thrust vectoring to 27 series missiles it might look fine at those altitudes). BTW in last patch of DCS:World, missiles doing very very strange things like rolling vertically, I hope by missile AFM you fixed those things.
×
×
  • Create New...