ohmyflanker

I don't know the facts you said, but in wikipedia and the encyclopedia in the game, we can find R-27ER has a longer range than AIM-120C, which likes the performance of them in FC2. However, they have the same range in FC3(v1.2.5) as my tacview shows. Aren't they facts? Or shouldn't we consider them as facts? Anyway, this is a game after all, and it is the BVR combat between F-15Cs and Su-27s that makes FC our favorite game. But now, with Su's and Mig's missiles porked, I'm afraid that few wanted to fly Su-27 and Mig-29S, and they wouldn't like this game anymore. So please make the combat between F-15Cs and Su-27s more balanced on the basic of simulation. Tacview-20130725-152952.txt.rar

Soon, you will find that there are F15Cs playing BVR combat only and that no one fly Su27:mad:

Yes,R-27ER loses targets so easily that it's hit rate is extremly low,and thus I think the missile can hardly hit any targets but civil aircrafts in FC3.:( Of course,all missiles appear to have a better AFM in FC3 than that in FC2.:thumbup:

Was this test in the latest version of FC3? I had a test and the results was different from yours.The top speed of AIM-120C is surely higher than that of R-27ER. R27ER vs AIM120C.trk Tacview-R27ER vs AIM120C.txt.rar

The maximum speed of the first R-27ET was wrong apparently compared with the others in first track. Besides,the maximum speed of AIM-120C was wrong apparently according to encyclopedia in FC3 and that result in AIM-120C had more energy than R-27ER in second track. R-27ET's problems.trk R-27ER vs AIM-120C.trk

I found R-27ET missiles launched when Su27 is turned over had wrong trajectorys and spent much more energy than normal.But there are no big diffrences between them in FC2.And I've attached acmis to illustrate them. Besides,I don't think the fact that AIM-120Cs have more energy and higher maximum speed than R-27ER is in accord with encyclopedia in FC3.I wonder if this is a bug. acmis in tacview 1.2.rar