Ktulu2
-
Posts
697 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ktulu2
-
-
There's currently a Tu-22 mod in work that looks pretty great :D
-
Geez, 2Gb of Vram is problematic? I'm using one XD
-
The F-5 we have is a copy of the american E version. Export variants had plently upgrades/modifications that completely changed the plane. I highly doubt they'll add this. (you can mod it though :D)
-
Well funny thing : for me, in 1.5 all's good.
In 2.0 though, I set clouds at 200m and had them at 3000m...
(density of 5)
-
Instead of the ''Hey, what are you doing!'' we should have ''no No NO NOO NOOo NOOOOO ''
-
Yeah, I didn't express myself correctly :
RCS, from what I remember, uses a single value so you get a guesstimate of taking aspect into account, instead of more accurate methods.
Also, in the case of FC3 planes, the range of detection is very standardised, while the F-15 should have a big edge on the 29.
Ground reflections do not affect us by flooding the radar, flying low should reduce the range of detection significantly, even worst for flying into mountain valleys (more than just being blocked physically).
ECM are very simplified, though not related to stealth directly, they still count in radar modelling/strategies you can use in game.
I meant not before we get a semi-realistic radar model.
-
Not untill we get semi-realistic radar modelling that cares about RCS etc
-
You haven't said what's on the y axis so i'm not too sure what this is. Is y the enlargement? The net pixel size?
-
Mig-29S entered service in 1992, two years prior to the R-77 (that, to this day, is only deployed on such a small scale you wonder why we have them in a late '90s FC3 series)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BiEo_eFfMrbD9oOLe8ddIVboQ2QvdgDvd3vazxK2PU0/edit#gid=0
-
*getting ready to resurrect trololo guy for rage's next comment*
(and also, rip thread)
-
The AI uses tactics. Remember the many times it just began RTB'ing randomly? Well he was bringing you in his SAM coverage!!
Seriously though, ACM (which is what you seem to be on about) is something that I think should be practices against real pilots, as AIs are far from impredictable unlike pilots, which makes it kind of a moot point IMHO.
-
Master modes (at least combat ones) are something you'll definitively want on your hotas so that you can access them without leaving your controls, not quite sure why you aren't putting your VR stuff on your boxes instead, seems much more logical to me.
-
Pepin, as said in many threads, the F-15 was designed with an OPERATIONAL limit of 9G (so much more for longevity&accidents) unlike the -27 that was meant to pull 9G only in clean configs. Just go look at combat logs for F-15s and you'll see it is normal...
As for 3-Bags climbout, it's not because the pilot has a highly unefficient loadout and not cost effective one that he shouldn't be able to reach only 50 000', which is 10 000 feets BELOW the SERVICE ceilign. On top, he is about to stall so he just went from mach 1 to near-vertical from take off.
If 2-bags F-15 can fly stable at 60 000' (up to 100K' clean peak), I don't see why 3-baggers couldn't reach similar altitudes as two bags, especially for like 30 seconds before stalling...^...
Now back on topic hehe
The PFM of the eagle becomes VERY apparent at high AoA (20+) below 150 knots, or anywhere near stalls in general, where you really ''feel'' the stall.
If you wanna test the pfm, go CAS and YAW controls off and enjoy the flanker feeling, these are the systems that give the eagle its semi-FBW.
-
We can't have anything else than Dos Gringos-worthy tankers or drunk ATCs, I'd doubt something as complex as an airdrop is in the pipeline.
-
If you are flying russian planes pickle won't do much. What you could do is look at a device analyser (windows, targets, dcs etc.) just to see if the pickle comes on randomly. If not, you may have a double mapping of pickle/a conflict, or if you are using target, if you have any command using space and right alt (this is the command to fire missiles).
Otherwise, the only thing I see is that if you jettinson weapons while missiles are selected, it will shoot missiles.
-
Weird issue...What kind of joystick do you have? Is it a 30 years old thing that has shorts all over it? I never had this problem.
-
Well BMS solved the problem so there certainly are ways around other than 50000000$ screens
-
I'm well aware of what dopppler shift is. To me, it doesn't seem right either way. There is a clear modulation separate to the doppler shift.
Tested last night, could not reproduce any sort of issues with the jet sitting still on the ground.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T707A using Tapatalk
The shift pattern will vary depending on how far from you the plane will pass.
i.e. If the plane goes really close to you and you only consider this in one dimension, you will hear the maximum high frequency, than all the shifting in VERY quick, than the lower frequency right away.
Now if the distance at which the plane goes from you is not negligible, you will hear the maximum frequency far, followed by an arctan transition phase while the plane is passing you that will last in proportionally longer to the distance at which the plane is passing from you, than another arctan transition to the minimum frequency far away.
Could this be the modulation you are hearing?
-
I made a manual on BVR, so that should help you with missile evasion : http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=162423
Missile defence isn't something you can cover in a few lines.
-
Also, when you end up putting smart scalling on, it destroys all sense of range/distance, as zooming in makes sprites smaller...
-
1
-
-
+1, many pilots affirmed they had tally near 10NM, so keeping sight under 1NM should not be an issue
-
Who knows...Maybe someone was lighting a cigar? lol ok that's a bug
-
Well. if the target is on AB, this seems possible, as the P5 is supposed to have the M seeker in the P's body.
-
Shoot at a chopper with missiles...You musn't have done much cap to suggest such a thing.
Republic F-84 Thunderjet, Thunderstreak
in DCS Core Wish List
Posted
Not a fan of 1st gen jets, but there's one version of the 84 that I'd like...You know, the one that makes the whole ground crew sick, the all mighty supersonic turboprop XF-84H!!!