Zacam

Even though the relative distances are marginal? Are the files pertaining to the track information editable? I like the training missions for the fact that you can run it once to see how it's done, run it again to do it yourself. And while they don't have a need for significant replay value, it's still moderately irksome that they're off by the small margin that they are. Thank both of you though for the rapid response.

As this is the most recent thread for patch 1.12a and I cannot find (within since 1.12a was released till now) any posts on the matter, I'm placing my question here. I have Lock On Gold US CD box set. Dowloaded the appropriate 1.12a patch for English Gold CD USA. I previously ran the game under the original Lock On install and again after I installed Flaming Cliffs. Since installing the 1.12a patch, I notice several training missions are now flaged as being "1.1 Only" and while they _do_ run, they encounter inaccuracies. (Such as: The training mission for the Launching of Mavericks is tagged as 1.1. You can run it, but when the "pilot" is supposed to acquire lock on with the Mavericks, the convoy is not actually being targeted and the missiles are just being wasted.) The training mission for landing has the taxi turn towards the parking space AFTER the actual portion of the strip that it's pressumably supposed to taxi on. So, what changes happend in 1.12a to break these missions, what other missions got broken (I've only so far looked at the training missions as I've just gotten the game) and if they were aware that these missions were going to break, why not include fixed missions in the patch?

Don't forget to set CPU affinity if you're running two "singles" applications concurrently with each other. Other wise, they'll both be doing "core sharing" rather than utilizing a dedicated core. I have several dual core systems (Intel and AMD) and they both perform perfectly fine. Though in clock comparing a single core 3800+ to it's X2 brother with all other hardware the same (on a socket 939 motherboard), there are no appreciable differences in the performance. On the dual core, though, I can set the processor affinity for LOMAC to the first core and fraps to the second core, and each maintain themselves a LOT better than trying to run both of them on a single core machine.