Jump to content

HAE5904

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    86

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by HAE5904

    RN 24

    in MiG-21Bis

    Posted

    Or just... eject before the RN24 detonates, because we are super pilots and can withstand the 10K nuke blast.....unfortunately not your MIG. LOL

     

     

    Not realistic ofcourse, but for sightseeing purposes.

    • Like 1

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    HAE5904, the question stems from the fact that the USSR wasn't a faction in DCS until recently. Aircraft modules that were made before that faction came into existence were simply thrown into the "Russia" faction.

     

    However, after the "USSR" faction came into existence, ED/devs never bothered to include soviet weapons to the USSR, causing the USSR to miss the liveries of the MiG-15bis, MiG-21, Mi-8, etc, etc...

     

    If you want to make a Cold War mission with the MiG-15, you HAVE to choose Russia as a faction or else you get the default (North Korean) livery.

    I know, I only replied to his picture explaining the difference, as he only posted the pics, without any explaining text.

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    Says the guy who wrote:

     

    Good one!

     

    No need to lecture anyone here when you are the only one who doesn't understand Akatsuki's request.

    LOL, then YOU simply don't understand the answer I gave, you're mixing up different posts dude... Read before you give any reply.

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    If this is true why did Ukraine end up with Tu-160s that they had to give back? Why did so many countries share the leftover Sukhoi and MiGs? Many countries were part of the USSR. While it’s simple to write it off as Russia since they are the biggest and most powerful it denies the contributions of many nations.

    For example, Antonov was a Soviet manufacturer, but geographically they are part of Ukraine. So while Russia still uses Antonov airplanes, Antonov would never sell them a plane again. There was also many airplane factories that were soviet but were not Russian upon USSR breakup, such as Tbilisi causing a huge pause in Russian aerospace in the 90s as they figured out how to do everything without Ukrainians and Georgians. And the Czech. The L-39 is Czech not Russian despite having been a Soviet airplane.

     

     

    I wonder how many export skins we will get. Eqypt or even Shenyang version.

    Wow, history ain't your thing is it? Ukraine was in time of the USSR part of it, and only became independent when the USSR/Warchau-Pact dissolved. So, being Warchau-Pact all equipment were provided as an unified USSR to defend themselves. This also answer your L-39 question, the trainer was developed as a Warchau-Pact basic/advanced trainer, no matter where it originated, as long as it was part of the Soviet Union / USSR / Warchau-Pact. That's why it is usually referred to as a Russian plane, as Russia was the big boss of the the USSR/Warchau-Pact.

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted · Edited by HAE5904

    attachment.php?attachmentid=203346&stc=1&d=1548766501
    USSR is the Soviet Union,, Russia in the pic should be referred as CIS, in other words, the Russia AFTER the demise of the Warchau -Pact & USSR.

     

    Don't you ever had history lessons?

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    Can you please make sure that the soviet skins are available not just to Russia but to USSR as well?
    ?? Soviet = USSR = Russia. This may answer your not so clear question.

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    "I only use photographs as reference, not scale models. "

     

     

     

     

    I want to show that Romanian migs (Mig-15/17/19/21/23) till 1986 dont have stars on top of the wings.

    Do you have photographic evidence?

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    Speaking of the Czechoslovak livery... just seen this on the internets...

     

     

     

    :D

     

     

     

    Just saying but... why do people have tendency to switch the blue and red? Not the first time I've seen it...

     

     

     

    unknown.png

     

     

     

    Remember kids, Blue always forward, red either down or inwards.

     

     

     

    1048.jpg

    Well kid, the b/w photographs did show the red part differently on the vertical tail for that particular skin. But to comfort the Czechs, I already fixed it.

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    Included liveries?

    in MiG-19 Farmer B

    Posted

    That's a camo given by the museum of the Luftwaffe, thus historically incorrect. All East German MiG-19 had only bare metal skins.
    True, that is why it will be part of, what I call, fictious skins. Some people have to be aware that the model is a Mig-19P, not a - PM, neither a - S, J-6 etc . And all operational - 19P only had metal skins..

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    AV-8B Night Attack livery suggestions

    in AV-8B N/A

    Posted

    Really? It only happened for a couple of moments. Never had it before either. Is there anything I can do about it?
    It's black because DCS is unable to load the textures, usually a memory issue or a bad graphic card. Maybe try with some graphic scenery settings toned down?

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    AV-8B Night Attack livery suggestions

    in AV-8B N/A

    Posted

    There is a spanish NA variant of the Harrier (EAV-8B N/A). The spanish N/A Harriers are missing the FLIR system up on the nose or in front of the windscreen compared to the AV-8B, I believe.
    Nonsense, before they were updated to Plus standards they were plain vanilla AV-8B. Only the USMC operates the NA, so liveries are limited to USMC alone. Sure once the PK is out, everyone can make his own livery. But to have all possible liveries, whether real or fictional in one DCS package will be impossible.

     

    Hank

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    AV-8B Night Attack livery suggestions

    in AV-8B N/A

    Posted

    Why would Spanish harriers be fictional?¿?¿? aren't the ones I posted in the images the version modeled for DCS????
    This package is about the NA, not the vanilla, nor the Plus. A Spanish NA, is non existing, so therefore would be fiction.

     

    Hank

     

    Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

    DCS: M-III by Razbam ?

    in RAZBAM

    Posted

    For the record, the - CJ was NOT downgraded. In fact it was operationally upgraded from a pure high altitude interceptor into a multi functional fighter. It retained the original radar the French used, but only discarded the rocket pack. The late '50s and early' 60s cannot be compared to today's standards of customers getting downgraded material due to political issues.

×
×
  • Create New...