I don't want to hear about how they can't be compared for the nth time again, It isn't even what I goddamn asked about.
This was about finding a better alternative to the SU-25T which is as I understand (At this time) it as the SU-25KM.
If I see another god damn post about how they can't be compared...
TL: DR.
Comparisons between the A-10A\C and the su-25T\M\KM are now off topic.
Realistic edition
Ain't no way we're ever going to get a pak-50.
Contenders are:
Su-22M5
Mig-23* (su-23 on the poll)
Su-24M
Su-25KM.
Mig-25*
Su-27S
mig-28
Wildcard-
yak-38
*none specific version
Ps: you can vote for more than one aircraft.
I like it because it's not as complicated to fly as the a-10A
Sorry? What's that? You want me to tell you how to explode on the ground? Do it yourslef you stupid bomb
Never mind.
Found what I was looking for was a su-25KM (nick name: scorpion)
I thought there was some airframe I've never heard of. Turned out what I was looking for was an upgraded su-25. And after looking at that cockpit, I know what I'd rather fly.
Or decided that the su-34 is better than the a-10 I terms of armament, better than the f-15 in terms of multi-role and better than anything regarding SEAD capability
Dunno how durable it is. If it's as durable as the su-27-- might not be so hot.
Wow, thanks very much, if you come across any specifications, blueprints or the like of trollys that carry ordinance that would be greatly appreciated :3
The HUD literally points everything out to you, in the su-25 you have to fiddle about with the optical system to spot. I've went over the target more times than none. The only way I've found a way around that is using the mercury pod (night vision) to spot targets a lot easier
But anyway. Isn't the su-34 just better at doing the same job?
yeah, i agree. i want to withhold whinging about the lack of power fully loaded but then i figure the a-10 is no better off.
but what about the su-34? thats a pretty sick fighter-bomber aircraft.