Frosty

multi-display panel. i saw that the yak-130 might take on a fighter bomber role

the su-25SM3 does look good i wonder what changes to the hud or cocpit it has

I see. I did not know that. -CLOSED-

I think it's all to do with the target acusition. A-10 has some snazzy features all to do with seeing the target and that's one of the trickiest parts for me having no trackIR. I was really just looking for something to admire Also: 1/ Arma infantry in DCS will highlight what problem? 1/ What is maws?

Edited

I came across a bug the other day that is quite game braking. The bug is as follows: Starting the mission from the ramp or parking area in the su-25T (launched either from the mission editor or the instant action. Note: have not tested the tutorial mission since before I updated to the 1.5 patch.) has a odd issue with the flaps The flaps light indicators show that the aircraft has the left side flaps in landing mode (two steps down) while the right side flaps indicate take off (one step down). When trying to operate the flaps they do not respond. This issue does not apply to any other aircraft for me, nor does it effect starting the mission from takeing off from the runway. Ps: I have not tested to see if it affects every runway. Edit:15:46-30-10-105

edit: I don't want to hear about how they can't be compared for the nth time again, It isn't even what I goddamn was asking about this was about finding a better alternative to the SU-25T which is as i understand it as the SU25KM If I see another god damn post about how they cant be compared... TL: DR Comparisons between the a-10 and the su-25 is now off topic

Oh the aircraft carrier. Sorry we don't have many haha. Seriously though. **** Lockheed.

G.w bush mod? Wat?

So I was messing around in the editor trying to do a cobra move, and I set the weather way to bad. Like. Snowing and foggy blind bad. After I did my stunts I thought I would try do a landing. My first in the su-27, and first in the blind. I'm so happy with it even though I came off the end a bit. But the point is. Can someone record this for me from my track. Just the entire landing section. Thanks.

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=151269

I'm going to do all the equipment required from cold start, things like intake covers, ladders, genorators, heaters, ordinance trollys, fuel truck, helo-blade ties. I have no intrest in modelling anything at all for aircraft carriers. As for your guy, hook me up :D

Someone mentioned ground crew before take off. Does anyone know of anyone who knows a cat who's was chased by a dog who's owner drinks at a bar that has someone who works as actual ground crew to cue me in on pictures, procedures and the rest of it

DCS: ground crew £30?

I made a thread about this detailing trollys, generators and heaters and i am seriously considering doing it

yeah, i wouldn't want to hard code all of those triggers, trigger circles into the game either Jesus... i would of thought you could at lest do the people operating the stream launcher currently but then again that would be part of the ships animation.. if fact why don't they make all the people on the decks part of the ship? this would a lot easier if there was a 3d editor to experiment with

A bad habit my iPhone commits itself too

The S is the best bet we have unless something gets declassified I've had a good trudge though it and there's hardly anything available

The S veriant is good enough. Seriously. But no one told me about this bad boy before But I've changed my mind and would love to see a su-17(what ever variant. Don't care) Really interesting looking design. Like a mig19 but with sweeping wings? (Arma 2 mod shown, best image showing what I mean)

God, why don't you google it :/

I have no idea how to respond to that hahaha Maybe it reduces heart disease by killing you with missiles

i haven't got FC3 lol

Name confirmed. DCS: arms dealer coming to a hole in your wallet soon

Is the mig-29s flyable in fc3?

yeah but like. can we use them. are there systems fully declassified