Jump to content

Frosty

Members
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frosty

  1. I don't want to hear about how they can't be compared for the nth time again, It isn't even what I goddamn asked about. This was about finding a better alternative to the SU-25T which is as I understand (At this time) it as the SU-25KM. If I see another god damn post about how they can't be compared... TL: DR. Comparisons between the A-10A\C and the su-25T\M\KM are now off topic.
  2. I wouldn't know, what are they doing atm
  3. ditto for su-25T
  4. General consensus it seems is that the fall of the Soviet Union was the worst thing to happen to DCS
  5. Source on that ?
  6. **** it. Imagine it says mig-23 instead
  7. It would be really fun for me to have a full fidelity cockpit like the a-10
  8. Really? No CCIP till the 90's? Shocking Warthog beta program ? Haha
  9. Realistic edition Ain't no way we're ever going to get a pak-50. Contenders are: Su-22M5 Mig-23* (su-23 on the poll) Su-24M Su-25KM. Mig-25* Su-27S mig-28 Wildcard- yak-38 *none specific version Ps: you can vote for more than one aircraft.
  10. Oh that's neat. Su-25km su-22M4 or Su-23 New poll time
  11. I like it because it's not as complicated to fly as the a-10A Sorry? What's that? You want me to tell you how to explode on the ground? Do it yourslef you stupid bomb
  12. It would be awesome to see an updated su-25 in DCS but the fact we already 2 veriants it's very unlikely.
  13. Does anyone know a tone of info on the su-17? Would it be a good choice ?
  14. Never mind. Found what I was looking for was a su-25KM (nick name: scorpion) I thought there was some airframe I've never heard of. Turned out what I was looking for was an upgraded su-25. And after looking at that cockpit, I know what I'd rather fly.
  15. In literally looking at the avionics and sensors only
  16. Never mind So i guess there isn't something as good as the a-10 on the Russian side apart from the Su-25sm3 That is all that was needed to be said
  17. I guess it's just a shame really. Seems like too much of a hassle just to get one missile
  18. Or decided that the su-34 is better than the a-10 I terms of armament, better than the f-15 in terms of multi-role and better than anything regarding SEAD capability Dunno how durable it is. If it's as durable as the su-27-- might not be so hot.
  19. can the su-34 do SEAD, and isn't it a better CAS aircraft than the su25
  20. Wow, thanks very much, if you come across any specifications, blueprints or the like of trollys that carry ordinance that would be greatly appreciated :3
  21. The HUD literally points everything out to you, in the su-25 you have to fiddle about with the optical system to spot. I've went over the target more times than none. The only way I've found a way around that is using the mercury pod (night vision) to spot targets a lot easier But anyway. Isn't the su-34 just better at doing the same job?
  22. Like I said. It's the HUD that makes the a-10 easier to Spot targets. Isn't the su-34 a good SEAD aircraft?
  23. What would you say was a better choice for SEAD?
  24. yeah, i agree. i want to withhold whinging about the lack of power fully loaded but then i figure the a-10 is no better off. but what about the su-34? thats a pretty sick fighter-bomber aircraft.
×
×
  • Create New...