Scorpion27

Ok, thats solid, ill give a shot with quadview instead of FFE OXR , THE only concern is current headroom on cpu. We will see.

Also i was thinking on opions on upgrading rig, one thig i want to avoid is changing mobo, with cpu it looks im on peak with 1200 socket, ddr4 ram...hmm...cpu limits ram to 2933mhz so i guess this is the end, the only thig that is left sticking to this set up is soft/hardware tweaking.

120 fps, ok ill try that. Also on lasso i canot identify P vs E cores (got no specific names on ot neither p/e buttons.

So heres my specs: i9 10800k OC to 4.9 GHz, 4080 Super Mobo: Z590 (1200 socket) 48 gigs ballistic ddr4 RAM 3000 MHz CL15 Reverb g2 set for 90hz (at 60 my eyes allmost hurt) I got fixed foveated rendering : performance/wide on open xr, turbo on Got DLL on, graphics setting basicly everything on low/mid, empty hangar Nvidia set for max performance The effectis as follows - i got: 6.5 ms on cpu, 9.9 ms on gpu, 65-75 fps, 6.5 vram, 34 ram-no artefacts, runs good ..still got stutters on barrel rolls. All tested on 4YA server with 30ish players online. Tried lasso, but i cannot identify P cores vs E cores, so left it on "all on", cpu dcs prioity set on high. Any ideas to get rid off those stutters?

@draconus i'm sorry for my attitude - just as mutch as You (and me) would like VR support for Combined Arms, I would like to have high tech RED fighters even in FC standard (we will probably see still lot of FC Su-27 pilots while FF MiG-29 will be available) Yes im totally aware that ED declared no more FC or FF RED (aside from fulcrum) - but im missing LOMAC times when opposig fighters were equally deadly to each other. I just hate to see those servers mixing platform for "balance" in order to have pilots willing to fight on both sides. Probably its not a server designer main idea to make it unrealistic - his idea is to make it playabe: that is give red side capable platform (usually fox3 /aim-120/ capable) so, I interpret this situation as actual demand from players for highly capable red platform. Also think that reminding ED from time to time customers request on different things (even if it was discused sometime in 2022) may have some positive effects. I did my part here so I'll just shut da fak up til 2029 with this issue.

Are you getting paid for discrediting discusion that doesn't fit holly narrative or is it just a hobby. 9L answered that it is not planned. Ok, in my opinion thats not the best idea but well money talks. I understand that .

Im not a fan at all of "we need balance so F-16s are RED, F-18s are BLUE" but that's the BS we have to deal with on MP servers - and guess what...all the realism that is on everybody's agenda goes out the window. We never gonna get FF Su-27/30/35/57 for obvious reasons. We could get FC those above but no for ED reasons, so it is what it is.

Well, in most pvp red vs blue servers in MP in order to "balance" sides...teams need to be mixed with blue/red planes, so there are F-16 vs F-18 etc. Since FF RED fighters "are not common" and perspective of F-35...wouldn't it be a smart move to introduce RED 4+/5 GEN planes in FC standard? Otherwise in modern scenario it always will be blue 4+, 5 gen vs red 4 gen, and that will cause unrealistic mixture of planes in game. Yes, I am aware of mods, but mods are mods...for some they work-for others not. And they are still quite popular, so how about that ED?

Hi! As the topic says. Looking for anyone flying F-16 in VR on STABLE public servers, willing to do some simple formation, refueling, some combat. No stress just fun and good time. Semi realistic stuff. Timezone: Europe. See ya.

+1 Same here...cant wait.

Thank you gents for all advices! I think its getting clearer right now to me. So.. I'll be aiming for MSI Z590 Mobo ( that should give some room for [hopefully not so near] future CPU upgrade) + i7 10700K (it should get me somewhere in 5GHz region) + liquid cpu cooler. Does it make any sence?

Unforunally money IS a factor... BTW, looking at different CPUs I can see those are around 4.x GHz...so to get 5GHz, I understand you guys overclock them right? Also, if the rig is used mainly for DCS (most demanding), is it worth investing in high number of cores?

OK, thanks. I got FPSVR and I am getting 30-45 fps on non busy scenarios, CPU is used at 80-90% level as it reports, GPU around same level. Any more eye-candy (right now almost everyting at min settings + PD 1.0 [DCS) and 2100x2100 Steam SS) and I get FPS drop to constant 30. I dont know...feels like that 2080Ti shot was a missed one. So as far as I know my Mobo has 1151 socket for CPU, so I guess theres one last chance of getting i7 7700 3,6Ghz (?), or maybe you have some other/better options for that MoBo. I'm guessing that in orter to get new CPU I need to change my MoBo as well.

Ok, so im totally confused... Recently I had an opportunity to get my hands on RTX 2080Ti. Currently my rig is: MSI Z270 Tomahawk i5 7600K (overclocked to 4,2GHz) DDR4 48GB 1TB M2 SSD (with DCS) RTX 2080Ti Reverb G2 New GPU was an uprgade form GTX 1080, but I cannot see any big difference with RTX 2080Ti (as I thought it should be). Im kind of lost...is there a bottleneck in my rig (CPU? MoBo?) I'm feeling I'm not getting most of my new GPU... THX for any advice.

I would agree with AstonMartinDBS: for full fidelity A-10: go for C model. A model is supposed to be easy to use FC3 plane (and that is its main strenght, and I think that's why its still popular), C is full fidelity. BUT at the same time it would be great feature to have LGBs on A-10A.