sereupin

GTX 970

che belle quelle nuvole ragazzi! sono emozionato!.... :pain: :shocking:

i have the same problem... very very slow to connect .. long waiting..

ma non sono io! ha sentito ?!

Ciao Jay, apprezzo sempre il sarcasmo :D, non c''e problema! resta il fatto che sviluppare un server dedicato non mi pare roba da ESA o NASA, soprattutto per una software house :) Ricordo nel forum in inglese qualche tempo fa di aver letto qualche discussione dove qualcuno forse provava a mettere in piedi su macchine virtuali i server di dcsw.. e forse, sempre se ricordo bene, settava qualcosa per far si' che venissero impiegate al minimo possibile le risorse hardware... Se qualcuno ha idee... son qui che lo aspetto a braccia aperte

Ciao a tutti.. molti di voi avranno già predisposto un pc che faccia come da server dedicato... Al di la' del fatto assurdo che la ED non abbia ancora sviluppato un banalissimo eseguibile che faccia da server dedicato, e sono passati ANNI, qualcuno di voi sa indicarmi se c'e' una strada per arrivare a qualcosa di simile, magari senza dover impiegare un pc e soprattutto dover acquistare una scheda vga dedicata? grazie!

1.2.8 is near, but still waiting for a dedicated server.. any news? thanks!

The premise is that I am a customer, a client who has a passion for this simulator , for aircraft , for the simulation: the proof is that over time, I have bought lock-on, then flaming cliffs 2, then DCS:A10c, KA50, Flaming Cliffs 3, KA50 2, P51 mustang, UH- 1H, and lately the last beautuful Mi8. So, after having said that, I believe that I have the right to express my opinion and my desires. I do not know how it will be EDGE, I wish for it all the best in the world, but, given the screenshots that were shown, I can not continue to hide myself behind auspices unfounded. If I look at the graphics, I'm sorry if I repeat, I do not see anything revolutionary, and a strong revolution to a dated and poor graphic quality as of DCS now, it would take and desiderable. To see the gold where is not there, it is scrambling on mirrors, and it is useless. If I had seen, or even just saw the improvement graph ( as for the sound ) which I am hoping from many years, then I would be here to say other things, but I can't catch a glimpse of it through the telescope.. then I care and I want to express my doubts / wishes / advice from the customer side to the manufacturer. That's it. Again this motivation, in the 2014, where there are cpu esacore, quad gpu systems with a lot of GBytes of memory, and we can put 32gb of ram in our pc with not much money.. With this power, I would expect much more than the design of 15 years ago, if you permit. To continue the game of "combat flight" vs "graphic flight", one can't live with the other one, or one exclude the other one, for me has not sense actually. I believe that it is possible to merge both aspects and have something beautiful. 15/10 years ago wasn't possible, but at these days yes. It is not a shame to watch and compare other things for to have an idea of there is out of the windows in this world. :) Anyway, I don't agree with you, I can't see this level of details from the screenshots of airports that I saw here. To try to make ridicolous my intections doesn't give any improvement to the situation. Nobody here is talking about to wish kids on their BMX on airfield in DCS. Yes, I agree (how couldn't be so), with REX addon, it could looks wonderful and the immersion could gain a strong improvement, so why not to walk in this direction. I am ED worker, so I am not able to value if it could be good or bad idea to work on it internally, or just to try to integrate something beautiful in their simulator. I think the second choice would be easier, for both sides, but it would be better to listen who can speak on it, not me. Yes, little bit slow, I agree.. about the sounds in the 1.2.7 still hadn't opportunity to prove it, I'm little bit skeptic to believe to don't find still "robotic" unrealistic sounds, but I wish with all myself that sounds will be another world, finally. waiting the release of 1.2.7 and I will tell what I think :) Look my introduction, there you can find my best "judgement": I bought every product of ED. :) And this, doesn't exclude to wish improvements as to suggest when necessary. Again, I wait, but for the moment, for what I saw, I have not good sensations. I am sorry, but concerning the graphic and especially the sounds, absolutely yes, it looks like very outdate.

I agree with youabout the performance and stability, of course! ...BUT, men, I continue to read "edge" as something beauty and special... or I am blind or I think that somebody here never saw or never tried what means to fly with REX or ORBX in other simulators... it is something unbelievable, and they run on a very old simulator as graphic engine (fsx).. Now, i continue to read here compliments every time that one screenshot arrives: again, are you blind or what?! I fly with lockon/dcs since years, and ok, I like it BUT we cann't continue to excuse and close our eyes in front of so strong evidences: - the graphic is simply old, like to see some game from the 1999.. structures, lighits, particulars, models, trees, lands, grass and so on, are simply terrible, totally not realistic.. it is sad, but it is just true. - the sounds are simply robotic, like to play with f/a 18 interceptor twenty years ago.. i would expect much much much more quality as realistic sounds in the 2014. there is the technology, there are many examples of games and simulators with thousands of times better as realistic sounds.. how long we have to wait for this essential implementation?! a good example is when i listen jet sounds from external camera..is should be realistic sound ?! come on.. - the sky, clouds, and weather system.. again, I must repeat myself but It is not my fault if develepers don't understand this central aspect. Other simulator have spectacular systems for to simulate weather, clouds and so on.. why it is so complicated to implement this ? So, I arrive to the end of my unconfortable opinion here about edge asking myself first, but especially to developpers, when and why still not they didn't permit to products like rex,orbx,gex and so on to be on DCS worlds... they could give surely and immediately a strong spin to up! :) As customer of DCS products (I have most of modules), there are years and years that I am hoping for this implementation.. but still nothing.. So, how will be sounds and graphic on EDGE engine? I am very afraid to see again the same totally old ridicolous low poor quality. I am sorry if i have been so direct and critic, but I wish a good dcs product for the future instead to have paid so much money for to use a very old simulator.. Nevada screenshots, show only poor graphic.. nothing revolutionary or special as in the 2014 i would expect as customer.. imho.. cheers..

Grazie ragazzi e grazie sopratutto a te Dio, per la pazienza, la disponibilita' e la gentilezza di spiegarmi in quel modo, l'ho apprezzato molto.. Questa sera come ti anticipavo nel messaggio privato, purtroppo non riesco a liberarmi, pero' riguardo alla tua idea di trovarci su skype, e perchè no, farci poi un voletto insieme sarebbe bellissimo! Sono un super principiante e quanto leggo, te ne sai un bel po'..e imparare fa sempre bene PS: cavolo! ma lavori anche oggi che è domenica ? :doh:

che dire, prima di tutto un grazie per aver trovato queste chicche! :smartass: il problema è che ho compreso il 5% forse di quello che è stato scritto.. mi fa piacere comunque che tu sia riuscito a capirci qualcosa...

e si! così non si possono fare missioni dove è prevista una soppressione delle antiaeree nemiche, pena l'abbattimento preventivo quasi assicurato appena si entra nel loro raggio d'azione.. direi che si tratta di una bella menomazione al gioco..

ehila'!! allora c'e' qualcuno in questo forum ! avevo da tempo perso la speranza che qualcuno avesse delle risposte.. io il problema continuo ad averlo.. a volte partono, altre scoppiano dopo 1/2 secondi davanti a me... misteri della vita Non ci resta che aspettare le correzioni a quegli errori... ps: grazie del tuo aiuto :)

ahahahaha.. i think you are right mate :megalol: this is exactly what I would like to do, if It's possible.. the open port can be the 8080, wich that our proxy use for to can navigate on internet by iExplorer... the "idea" was in some way to "simulate" that DCS server is just datas trasnferred from and between the http 8080 used for to navigate or to be connected with skype.. in skype, i set the proxy address of my company, the port is 8080 and then i put my username and pw for autentication.. and it goes "out".. if I could find a way to do that with dcs, would be great :joystick: here I lost myself.. i am too much ignorant, also in my poor english...:doh: what do you mean with " if the tunner ends at your home" ? I think that I miss the basics of internetworking :(:doh: I would like to make the server hosting of DCS at my home, but i have 2 problems: first, my provider give me a connection with a IP like "private", internal.. for example from my modem I have this kind of IP 10.194.xx.xxx but the public ip is another one.. so I can't make myself visible on internet.. would need a public IP that I have not.. second problem, my connection speed is ok for myself..if I would host a server with 4 or 6 people, + teamspeak server, I would need much more speed connection.. where I work, i have my pc 24/24 switched on, and the connection speed is 6Mbps on download as upload .. why don't use this treasure for free? :D I understand what you mean... layer 7 is about the iso/osi .. in other words, it works directly by application... isn't it? anyway, thank you for your kind explanations, help and sense of humor (about to offer a beer to my sysadmin :megalol:)

thank you for your help.. let me ask one thing, and i am sorry for my ignorance.. if in my lan i am able to "go out" on internet by iexplorer, and also i am able to use teamviewer (i can connect to this pc from my home) or skype, there is not a way to use this " open door" for to setting up a vpn or something similar for to can make a server of dcs or teamspeak ? i tryied to use openvpn, vpnreactor and others, like the vpn of teamviewer or hamaci, and after I install them, they can't connect, like if they are blocked... but, if they are blocked, how is possibile to teamviewer to be visible from my home ? thanks again! :)