Jump to content

Guille H. Mono

Members
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Guille H. Mono

  1.  

    Go get the mod, do the start-up, fly and try an assault landing in a tennis court. See what you miss, watch in the videos what is already done.

    Just give a new 3rd party a chance. 

    The Razbam funeral has been going on for years in the licensed-third-party-projects/RAZBAM section.

     

     

     

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  2. On 5/24/2025 at 2:15 AM, Hotdognz said:

    I have been tracking the CH47 as my last purchase of a ED module since Nov 2024, I did this to see how development went after the big updates to it in October 2024, I considered the Apache to have a good dev cycle and thought this might too as I believed ED to have an experienced helo team, I was using this tracking to figure out if I would buy the MIG 29A in EA, based on the below list of added features since October 2024, its slowed to a crawl in the dev cycle, so I decided to hold of the MIG 29A

    My tracking was for added features not fixes to existing added features and I was looking for value added to make it fun to use in missions for its intended purpose of logistic, as you can see in 2025 we have had 2 added features and still have no ED added logistics features.

     

    2024

    October 30 - Major update

    CH-47 added items not fixes

    Added. Longitudinal Cyclic Trim (LCT) functionality in automatic and manual modes. LCT reduces fuselage nose down attitude as speed increases by tilting the rotors according to airspeed between 60 and 150 knots. This allows the fuselage to remain level for cargo and troops.

    Added. Differential Air Speed Hold (DASH) functionality (WIP). As you increase speed, the DASH, (a long tube in the flight controls with an actuator on each end) will increase in length. If you move the cyclic back to center, the aircraft will still maintain airspeed. This allows you to keep the cyclic in a more natural, centered position when flying at higher airspeeds. 

    Added. ARC-201D and ARC-220 radios (WIP).

    Improvements to many MFD and CDU pages.
    Continue working on synchronization (WIP).

    November 2 - Hotfix

    CH47 - Nothing

    November 5 - Hotfix

    CH47 - Nothing

    December 5 - Major update

    CH-47 added items not fixes

    Improved. Synchronization of MFD screens and buttons.
    Implemented loading, display and addition of Fix Points to the flight plan
    Implemented display of FPP based on airfields/navaids with corresponding symbols

    December 12 

    CH47 - Nothing

    December 24

    CH-47 added items not fixes

    Added. Trimmer options
    Added. Trimming with HAT on stick
    Added. Windshield wipers
    Improved. DASH tweaks
    Improved. Crew animation become faster when switching seats
    Improved. Further work on CDU pages


    2025
    January 21 - Major update

    CH47 - Nothing

    February 6 - Campaign Fixes only

    CH47 - Nothing

    February 20 - Major update

    CH47 - Nothing

    March 6 - Campaign Fixes only

    CH47 - Nothing

    March 20 - Major update

    March 26 - Hotfix

    CH47 - Nothing

    April 18 - Major update

    CH47 - Nothing

    April 22 - Hotfix

    CH47 - Nothing

    April 24 - Hotfix

    CH47 - Nothing

    May 6 -  Campaign Fixes only

    CH47 - Nothing

    May 22 - Major update

    CH-47 added items not fixes

    Added: Liveries for Spain, Iran, South Korea and Royal Canadian Air Force
    Added: Collective position added to the Controls indicator


     


     

    It's like we are doing charity here. But the kind of unefficient charity that helps no one, fixes nothing and only aggravates self destructing behaviours.

    ED has dropped out of the list of companies I would trust to buy Early Access.

    • Like 2
  3. I get home in 2h, let me check, clean mods and share 😉

    - I cleaned the mission of Mods. The infantery units have 50 seconds hold/wait on initial waypoint before they start moving.

    Played it last week, loaded the infantery and had a long low level flight until droping the troops at Troll Oil Plataform (now changed for default cargo ship). Embarking and disembarking went ok. 

    Let me know how it goes. I will try again other maps if I find some time this weekend.

    embarking setup.jpg

    Kola NOMODS.miz

    • Like 1
  4.  

    4 hours ago, CRUD said:

    Anyone else having trouble embarking CH USA Infantry to a CH-47F you are flying?  I set them up but when I look at ground troops to call them to board they aren't an option.  They'll board AI aircraft ok but won't board a client aircraft.  

    Only works for me In Kola. Two independent groups of CH inf. (no ATGM).

    I tried same method in Marinas, Nevada and PG and they never show as an option in comms menu. 

  5. The actual stryker in DCS can be updated and expanded with ambulance, mortar, TACP and other variants relevant for gameplay!

    • Like 1
  6. Same here, spent two hours in the morning setting up a template for a training flight tonight. I'm so ******* happy right now I just going to the E-shop to throw some money at the new shiny ball.

    8 minutes ago, Dragan said:

    Nothing is clear to me, today I flew 2 mission during the day, one in the morning and one later in the afternoon, everything was fine 🤨

     

    • Like 2
  7. On 2/7/2025 at 11:11 PM, NineLine said:

    We are getting close to releasing the next section, we will share it in the newsletter when it's released. Thanks. 

    Lets hope it comes with the major update and fixes promised for the Southwest Afghanistan part.

    • Like 2
  8. I bought the Chinook in the state it was released  because it really felt like ED needed it. Then got burnt with Afghanistan - complained and got bullied out of any ED Early Access product for good -  to then find out there was really something off when a 'more talented' team released Iraq without the awfull visual issues of Afghanistan.

    I don't know what to think anymore. It just feels like a stunt and adds more uncertainty.

    • Like 4
  9. 3 hours ago, Ala12Rv-Tundra said:

    Imagine having the option for not paying upfront, if you as a customer, dislikes the uncertainty of early access.

    I have found myself imagineing this more and more often lately and the first consecuence is me not spending a cent in DCS until 2028, when C-130J comes out of EA.

    There was a time when an ED product in early access was self guarantee. Even with the 'two weeks' and 'all subject to change" thing it only required patience but I never felt the uncertainty you talk about until now.

    • Like 2
  10. 59 minutes ago, Tom P said:

    Yeah I haven't touched this map since launch...

    I have a group of about 30 players that all bought this and are in the same boat. 

     

    I keep trying every time i run DCS and I can't use it for more than five minutes. In its current state I prefer to use Nevada. 

  11. 46 minutes ago, Weta43 said:

    I tried to find lots of ways to phrase this that were more polite, but it boils down to - why the F*** do people keep buying early access products - that are clearly labelled as unfinished - then go into emotional meltdowns and paroxysms of forum post rage when they discover the unfinished product they bought is ... unfinished?

    All the maps were of poorer quality when released than they are now - ALL OF THEM.

    Frame rates on the Mariannas map were so poor when it was released that after trying the day I downloaded I didn't even bother looking at it again for months & until it had been patched a few times. It's a nice map now, but wasn't when released. 

    Afghanistan is in its first day of Early Access & people are complaining that it's not as polished as maps that have been being patched and de-bugged for years - in some cases a decade or more.

    After the tsunami of whingeing that appeared on the map's release, I downloaded & started it with a heavy heart, but I'm pleasantly surprised.

    There are some rough bits but on the whole - it looks an interesting map & geographically varied (even the north-east part of the initial release is far from being 'another desert map'), the frame rates are good, bits of the map are beautiful, and at 0m to 50m altitude, and from a couple of thousand m AGL it looks very nice. In between there are a few things to work on - but that's why they repeatedly, all over the forum, all over the download page and all over every social media channel and internet site it's mentioned on, say 'IT'S NOT FINISHED"

    If, when they say it's 'finished', you think its's not up to scratch - complain then.

    If it takes too long to get to 'finished' complain about that (but please wait at least a week from today)

    But for God's sake please stop complaining that the product you consciously bought in the full knowledge that it is unfinished, is unfinished, & do the rest of us a favour by not buying any more early access products.

    Please.

    We'll all be happier

    Hey mate, you can come with the EA song and all the screenshots and lectures you want but here are people just expressing a reasonable level of disappointment.

    At the end these are personal points of view and part of the feedback the EA process provides for the good of all. If you can not deal with opinions that don't match your own there is a 'praise the map' topic.  

    • Like 13
  12. It just looks awful and far below what I expect for an ED's Early Acces product. I tested it flying a Kiowa and I could not belive the ugly patchwork of textures and the absurd topography of roads connnecting main urban centers through gentle valleys. 

    Worst came when I thought 'well, it's and EA lets switch to F2 view and go as high as possible, sure it improves'.

    It didn't.

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...