Jump to content

Schizwiz

Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Location
    Belgium
  1. Next time I post something,I will make sure I know what I am talking about.
  2. I can only say: Good on you! All the hard evidence resides in your hands,as long as it is proven.
  3. Thank you very much for this explanatory guide.Just what I was looking for! The scattering effect is the most exaggerated effect of radar waves. The attenuation with radars located on land,compared to radars in the air,is higher,significantly higher.Atmosphere.Add all the weather effects of the standard atmosphere and you will understand that a radar works better at higher altitudes in the standard atmosphere. 13000m=39624ft. Have you ever thrown a baseball horizontally and one vertically?See where it leads you to learn about gravity.
  4. This is manipulated. Fatimir Pootin is happy with his work.
  5. Hydrazine could burn out entirely in the earths outer sphere,called the THERMOSPHERE.
  6. Since when does Lockheed Martin own the military channel?
  7. The only thing I can add,that my calculations are Always roughly as I calculate in fast modus operandi ,a foot to be 30cm,while it is 30,48. I can also say I rest my case,as it seems when the Russians have all the S400 systems,there is no real use of going into war scenario's.The only thing necessary is SAMS.Planes apparently don't hold a chance anymore.Let's start shooting satelites with SAM systems then.Make sure you give me a ring to call me names when you might realize the doppler effect works differently between two moving assets than between one stationary and one moving asset. No use to go in deeper here for me,I am the most complete idiot in this story,as I am just a ED forums visiter and I also never fly DCS anymore. I am unwilling to see through propaganda,I accept anything CGI made aswell. Call me Schizwiz now please,I have a paranoïd schizofrenia issue and genuinely think I am an intelligent person.OH forgive me Patriots for the confederate flag.
  8. Russians can brag,and I honestly believe 13 km is not bad of an estimate. It can reach 40 Nm when fired horizontally,not vertically. Go whine at the Pentagon.
  9. The link for your evidence video doesn't work.
  10. So you are a pilot indeed.Because with what you are stating….put a S400 missile on the Wings of a B52 it would fly several 100's of kilometres?If you would fix an AIM54 Phoenix to a SAM installation how high do you think it would fly all things considered? Same for a HARM MIssile. The U2 that got shot fell out of the sky,as the pilot was a traitor yet again.I don't think you know your history and also I do think your signature stinks like exaggeration. By the way ,you do know that missiles on aircraft get launched at higher speeds and higher altitudes than SAMs.But you know what ,as I am not a lockheed martin operative,steve kennets,I can only add that you are a real pilot,and I am an aircraft enthousiast and used-to be sim pilot.But anyway I never got shot down in DCS by SAM,flying the F15C. Badly modeled? Maybe,but hey you have all the dispensation and all the sources.At lockheed martin.I think that a Phoenix missile launched from the ground,vertical would reach a max of a whole lot less than A-A, kilometer ,but that would yet again ,be an estimate.Keep in mind that when the ego succumbs the self,you are in deed in danger of becoming ignorant. Good luck with your Modeling career and with your security dispensation.
  11. I don't know where you get you intel from,but the thing is that in your opinion nothing is safe anymore!Because in case you forgot...how high is the earth stratosphere? Because you sure as hell must be good at dodging in outer space,when you have sam missiles like that.13Km.Maximum.Or you are indeed a Lockheed Fartin Politbureau operative.Ever heard of a ground radar ,being able to pick up and lock enemy jets from that range,anyone else on this thread? because I sure as hell haven't.If you know something of RADAR and of Jets maneuvring and SAMS not,you must understand one basic thing! GROUND RADAR LOCKING and AIR-TO-AIR RADAR LOCKING IS VERY DIFFERENT.BECAUSE A SAM IS STATIONARY and JETS aren't.The maximum locking you get from a stationary object remains 13 km.That is 39000 feet.I would want a real Pilot's advice on this,because some people just don't understand anything of air-to air combat in comparison to ground-to air combat.Maybe I am that something,but I only have MY sources,NOT YOURS.
  12. Well I think Racefuel has a fuel drinking habit.As in GASOLINE!
  13. If you look at the standoff maximum effective range of the HARM missile,the A10C is still very effective at CAS.If the enemy makes more S400 Sams,make more HARMS.With a good F16/F18 joint effort of the air force and navy,anything is possible.Also the S400 only have 4 missiles at once at disposal,BIG EXPENSIVE SOVIET missiles,with highly exagerated capabilities.The time between launch is about 13 seconds,the maximum range is 13km vertically launched,maximum speed is mach 4,5.A warthog can fly above 13km altitude to throw a laser guide JDAM as well.Make a Maverick missile with a greater fuel capacity as well.The only thing necessary is AIR COVER,AIR SUPREMACY.Have HARMS clear the way,you have warthogs finishing the job.THe F35 is simply waste of expenditure,and it is failing miserably.
×
×
  • Create New...