Jump to content

TLTeo

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2464

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Posts posted by TLTeo

    RAZBAM's Surprise

    in RAZBAM

    Posted

    Why should they do that ?

     

    They did not deliver a complete module with the M2000C before announcing the Harrier. Mind you, the Mirage is still a work in progress and they are already teasing a new project.

     

     

    To be precise, they already have two more in the works - Mig19 and Super Tucano.

    AIM-7 Performance

    in Release Version Bugs and Problems (Read only)

    Posted

    I found the bug! Its the engine of the missile.

    It never reaches MACH 4 nor does it sustain Power for very long.

    The engine performance is more akin that of a SideWinder.

     

    Edit: It might be the drag that isnt correct as well, in either case the missiles range is WVR.

     

     

    This also happens in the Eagle, see for example this video:

     

     

    The Sparrow barely accelerates at all after launch.

    After the Tomcat?

    in Heatblur Simulations

    Posted

    This little bandit would be ideal for DCS.

     

     

    RJQkzm6.jpg

    I always thought the 51st's Stormo logo was the coolest in the Air Force!

     

     

    We need to be realistic, we're not going to get a Russian fighter that is post 70's. Razbam already tried with there MiG-23, but ED didn't give them the green light. I would love to see more Redfor aircraft, but it's just not going to happen. That said I think the Intruder would be perfect, that way we would have a perfect 1990's CVW.

    If I recall correctly, they said that Razbam's Mig-23 would "interfere with existing plans", not that they could never get the proper information or whatever. I agree we likely aren't going to get a 2005 Flanker/Fulcrum like with the Hornet, but that doesn't mean they can't add anything remotely modern (like an export Mig-23MLD to name one).

    After the Tomcat?

    in Heatblur Simulations

    Posted

    I'll be one of the Soviet-fanboys to counter the NATO-fanboys, and say "We need more quality Red Air!”

    MiG-23/27 and Mi-26 are high on my list...

     

    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

     

     

    Yea now that I think about it, the Mig 23/27 and the Tu-24 also kind of fit the "existing technology" thing they mentioned in some way. That would be pretty cool actually.

    After the Tomcat?

    in Heatblur Simulations

    Posted · Edited by TLTeo

    I'm very biased being Italian but I would absolutely love some version of the F104 (or hopefully more than one!), and it does kind of fit what Heatblur/Leatherneck have done before:

    - it's very challenging to fly like the F14A and Mig21

    - it's very versatile and can perform lots of roles like the Mig21

    - different versions could be implemented quite easily like the F14

    - it's not necessarily the shiniest greatest most loved plane on the block but it does have lots of personality like the Viggen and Mig21

     

    It's kind of a long shot since they mentioned using their own technology but hey, I wouldn't say no to a Tornado either ;)

    My gratitude

    in DCS: AJS37 Viggen

    Posted

    And that is why I’m actually anticipating the f-14 even more than the f-18. I hope it will have a distinctive character.

     

     

    Yep me too actually! Well, that and the fact that Tom Cruise didn't fly a Hornet ;)

    My gratitude

    in DCS: AJS37 Viggen

    Posted

    I agree that more content for the Viggen (at least one of the campaigns that was mentioned for example) would be very very welcome. I'm pretty excited about the fixes that Cobra has been mentioning for starters ;)

     

    That said, it truly is a spectacular module, and every time I fly it I'm in awe at just how awesome the plane is. Between the sound, flight model, systems and graphics it just feels so much more like the "real deal" than anything else I've flown. Heatblur/Leatherneck have really created something special.

    CI waypoint indicator wrong?

    in DCS: AJS37 Viggen

    Posted

    Hello,

     

     

    I'm not sure whether this is a bug or I'm screwing something up, but it seems like the waypoint indicator around the radar display isn't working anymore; it's stuck at 180 degrees rather than showing where my next waypoint actually is:

     

    x5b8MdW.jpg

     

     

    As you can see from the radar and distance indicator the waypoint is right ahead of me but the CI indicator is at the bottom.

     

    I recently switched from 2.5 to Open Beta by using the DCS_upater.exe file which is a little brute force, so I figure that could have caused it? I have tried both repairing DCS and re-installing the Viggen without success; do I need to try a fresh re-install? Has anyone else had this happen?

    Flaming Cliffs 4

    in DCS Core Wish List

    Posted

    I think FC4 should be some combination of stuff that is impossible to get in the game otherwise (especially RedFor planes like, say, the Su-34), or sub-versions of other things that are being developed and do not necessarily warrant their own module, like naval Phantoms. Iconic aircraft like Vietnam-era or WW2 planes deserve a full fidelity module imo.

×
×
  • Create New...