Shepski
-
Posts
1771 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Shepski
-
-
Went to bed after the sortie but I'll check it out!
In the first hop across the channel the AI rapidly slowed to about 140 when making level turns on the flight plan then sped up after the turn. It was quite shocking when sitting in formation with them.
.
Cheers!
-
Spoiler Alert!!!
What happedned on the 3rd sortie???
I was in formation coming back across the channel with a kill and another damaged. There were a whack of Spits behind us as we were the lead formation and the next thing I know I'm being shot up from close range and had to ditch. It's like a 190 spawned right behind me.
It was much easier to stay with the flight on this hop compared to the first escort mission as the AI kept proper speeds this time.
Nice work and looking forward to seeing what the other missions have in store.
-
On 1/31/2022 at 10:11 AM, Wags said:
As an F-16 throttle, nothing else comes close.
How I miss my FLCS/TQS! Hi Matt!
-
If the tires had as much rolling resistance as you assume it would greatly increase take off distance which sacrifices payload on shorter runways so I don't think the tires have a noticeable effect.
The Su-27 is similar to the F-15 in all regards with the exception of avionics so if Eagle pilots have to ride the brakes taxiing at idle thrust do you not think the Flanker should be able to taxi at idle thrust too?
If the Su-27 had to taxi with more than idle thrust it would waste a lot of fuel on the ground prior to take-off which is the primary reason jets are designed to taxi at idle thrust.
-
Idle thrust? You sure about that?
Yup. We taxi the 737 at idle thrust and if we are light we have to ride the brakes to keep our speed down. The Learjet was taxied at idle thrust as well.
Think of the amount of thrust coming from the huge engines on the Flanker, even at idle, and the rolling resistance of the jet. I wouldn't be surprised if they have to ride the brakes.
Read the bit here on taxiing the F-15...
-
I'm going to disagree with you at least partially on this one. There might be a bit too much drag--not sure about that--but I do know that I have watched a number of videos of Flankers taxiing with those nozzles (or at least one) opening briefly and, then, closing as they move down the taxiway. So there seems to be more to the story than just an error on DCS's part.
Hi Rich!
I have seen videos as well and this Russian Knights video,
after making a 90 degree turn you see thrust being added(nozzle movement) in order to get to get momentum back. This is normal because you slow down for sharper turns.In DCS you can't taxi in a straight line at idle thrust once you are at taxi speed. It feels like the brakes are being applied and you are slowed and stopped.
Watch the following video of a Flanker at taxi speed and idle thrust taxiing in a straight line followed by a Falcon at idle thrust.
-
There is too much drag after the jet starts rolling at taxi speed. you should be able to taxi at idle thrust once you have momentum.
The strength of the tires is poorly modeled and there is no way they should be blowing so easily.
The 2 bugs could be related in that there is too much friction drag associated with the modeling of the tires which is why the jet slows down too quickly and the tires blow too easily.
-
Use route following plus alt hold "h" together for lateral and vertical NAV.
-
Does anyone of you know if the gun camera footage is saved somewhere? That would be a great feature for AARs.
I`ve been searching and can`t find it.
-
I was happy it was cruising at 830. This a proper cruise speed. My issue is with it cruising at 480 which is much too slow at that altitudes.
I found out there is an error in the english Su-27 cockpit mod as it under reads the correct mach number so .6 mach was incorrect as stated above.
-
Guys, it's surprising (the wobble). But is it a bug?
A/P works fine if AoA is not too high.
Perhaps it's how it is in the real aircraft. After all, it's an early system...
Not a chance. The AP should works fine on an ILS approach at approach speeds with no wobble.
-
Not if you go fast enough to stop the wobble. :)
I have been able to use Route following combined with alt hold to effortlessly navigate laterally and vertically as long as I keep the speed up. The route following is a little too aggressive in capturing a track and doesn't turn early enough when switching waypoints but I just switch it myself earlier to get a smoother transition.
I have also been able to use the attitude hold and altitude/bank hold.
-
Regarding the Su-27 Flightstick -- what close air combat mode is enabled when switching to it?
- Close Air Combat Vertical Scan Mode?
- Close Air Combat Bore Mode?
- Close Air Combat HMD Helmet Mode?
Thanks.
I believe it is whatever mode is selected on the dial on the forward left side console.
-
I don't think so.
The correct answer looks more like: "because you use a modded (english) cockpit, and it appears the machmeter in that cockpit is wrong".
With the default (russian) cockpit, standard day at 9000m and 700-720 KIAS, you're at M1.06 ;)
Thank you!
-
2. I'm suspicious of the accuracy of the aerodynamic and kinematic modelling of missiles. Yes, that is a very different discussion but I do suspect that weapons loaded on the Su-27 are causing an exaggerated amount of parasitic drag. At present the change in the way the aircraft handles between an empty condition and even having say 4 x AA missiles is astounding. I think this could benefit from further review by the dev team.
After flying the A-50 escort mission in the Ultimate Argument campaign where I had to escort an A-50 to 9000m altitude, I had to go into afterburner to keep up with the A-50 in the climb once above 7000m.
I haven't tried this scenario with an empty jet but this doesn't seem right with a loaded one.
Edit... just tried at test at 9000m after climbing from take-off with full fuel. Got to altitude and needed to maintain afterburner to hold cruise at .80Mach IAS. I dumped all the missiles and still needed afterburner, although the EGT was a little less in order to maintain .80Mach. Funny thing is when I went to an external fly-by the jet was supersonic. Why would it be supersonic at .80Mach IAS?
-
Here is the same mission and after level off at 9000m the A-50 was cruising at 830 KTAS which is roughly 520 KIAS which is still under .6 mach. This is clearly a mission design issue and not an A-50 one.
-
Anyone finish the A-50 escort mission? After being released from escort duty I was told to Rtb. I did not get the usual order to contact the approach controller and after LA ding did not get the "mission successful" message and now have to rely it.
-
lol @ SDsc0rch your comment was hidden 1 page over :P
500 true airspeed is plenty fast for Su-27 to hang in there though.
Sure it can fly at 500 TAS which is just under 10 degrees AOA but it is not efficient whatsoever and I could hear my wingman in AB a lot trying to stay with me because of all the drag.
Cruise speed for the A-50 should be at least .70 mach at altitude.
-
actually shepski at 9k meters I don't believe the AWACs can actually fly any faster.
The AWACS once leveled off at 9000m was flying at 810 TAS then after crossing a waypoint started to slow down to 510 then sped up at another then slowed back down to 480. The waypoint speed was probably left at default rather than increased by the mission builder.
480 km/h TAS is about 300 km/h IAS which is a landing approach speed not a cruise speed even for a A-50 at high altitude.
Anyway... got 2 kills was told to RTB so RTB and landed but failed the mission. Have no idea why.
Edit... Tried again and flew past the airport to the return waypoint before turning final and got the success message after landing.
-
It's a bug... airplanes aren't designed to kill pilots. Pilots kill pilots.
-
Please, when designing missions that require a fighter to escort a transport or AWACS please set the heavy to fly at fast enough speeds so the Su-27 isn't hanging in the air at 9000m in order to stay in formation. The AWACS is barely flying too.
This is the AWACS escort mission.
-
I find the new su27 throttle response (as it corresponds to ground taxi speed) is completely different than other aircraft......at complete idle it rolls to a stop, cracked open to first throttle detent and it speeds up to 60-80+ km/hr
Agreed. Once rolling idle thrust should be enough to keep it going. It also slows very quickly when turning while taxiing.
-
3. I think we can all agree that the full waypoint-following autopilot on the Su-27 is painfully bad. If it's realistic, so be it but I suspect that it is not.
If you keep your speed it up and out of the wallowing range it seems to work fine in holding a course and following a VNAV(Vertical Navigation) profile. Where it is suspect is in the amount of intercept angle it uses to acquire the course between 2 waypoints. It is overly aggressive so get on course then engage route following mode.
I first engage route following mode followed by "h" baro altitude hold for enroute VNAV and it will fly quite accurately.
-
Part of the problem because of the excess drag they need to be in burner to catch up and sometimes keep up.
Winwing export eating cpu cycles
in Winwing
Posted
Having just got an F-16EX I was having issues and this thread has been great!
One correction on the above example... 0.01 gives 10 FPS and 0.1 gives much higher rates, probably closer to 100.
Cheers!