TobiasDeVil

This was not about some supernatural revelation of TBS, but about unraveling the threads of their dispute.

Well why not? How far from the truth is his report?

I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that, despite the great work done by the team behind the F-15E, this module cannot be saved if the element RZ is still in the equation and pulls it down.

Quickly, after a year? I'm sorry, I was just amused.

From my point of view, nothing has happened all year. The will that should have addressed and solved the problem at the outset will probably continue with its unique strategy and we will all be delighted with the results.

In retrospect, I see it as a quarrel between two small spoiled children who would need a third authority figure to resolve their dispute decisively enough.

I would like to ask whether the view of the end customer as a creditor is also taken into account in this situation. We have been offered a product for purchase that is still not in its final state. Given that the customer has invested his own money in this product, it is quite understandable that he may feel uncertain or even disappointed or even cheated. Especially if it is not clear whether the product will ever reach its final, full-fledged state. Should the customer have the right to be informed of the current state of product development and what steps are being taken to complete it? All the customer can do at this point is blow off steam on the forum and deal with the bang theories.

A symbolic link works well for me: Run cmd.exe with administrator rights Go to C:\Users\<user>\Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\ Create a Liveries folder and upload the liveries data Go to C:\Users\<user>\Saved Games\edModelViewerTrunk Create symbolic link: mklink /D Liveries C:\Users\<user>\DCS.openbeta\Liveries Now you can run: bin-mt\ModelViewer2.exe

For me, just a short sentence at the module that the date is moving, and can be removed again after the release, would be enough.

I'm just wondering why this message isn't actually posted on the main page, but only on the forum. I think certain public announcements should be entrusted to the pros.

On the day of the release this is really good and happy news, I didn't even notice any sign of apology, just a dry statement... I can imagine it at a concert, sorry folks, no concert today, come back tomorrow

I'm not sure if this has been reported yet, but for GBU-10, GBU-12, GBU-16 bombs the MFUZ option is not present.