My recent discussion with them was that FFB DCS is now on their roadmap but of course your right the priority could bump it down the list
NATOPS lists the forces, 2.8.2.8
Pitch rate and g (NZ) feedbacks improve pitch characteristics and g control at medium to high airspeeds. Air data scheduled pitch rate feedback improves maneuvering characteristics and provides increasing stick-force-per-g at low to medium airspeeds. AOA feedback provides increasing stick force with increasing AOA above 22°. In the takeoff and land modes, AOA and pitch rate feedbacks are used to augment inherent airframe pitch damping and stability. The computer nulls the difference between the trim AOA and actual AOA. In turns, pitch rate feedback maintains tight pitch attitude control.
11.1.5 Stick Force. In maneuvering flight, there is a light but constant stick force per g (about 3.5 to 4.5 pounds/g). Unlike many other aircraft, maneuvering stick forces do not vary significantly over the entire operating envelope as long as the AOA is less than AOA feedback of 22°. Where AOA feedback is active, maneuvering stick forces are increased significantly.
So the current static profile i have as an inner ring at the light but constant with an outer ring at 70% deflection which ramps rapidly up to the max this enables the nice constant feel with a big pull at limits so faking the lack of FFB for AOA and G, simple but currently it feels right