Reckoner

Well, wasn't try to make an argument to remove the MiG-19, but rather what's the point of using restrictions at all, since in fact some planes can instad get a lock even in front aspect. Try to think that from the POV of a new BLU player that while thinking that there are only rear aspct missiles in uses sees himself blown from front aspect while not capable of doing the same. And the MiG-19 is not the only problem. So is the MiG-21 Bis with R-60 and R-13M. No, not from time to time and even from quite a range. The tracking of both R-60 and R-13M seems off. Not only they are able to lock head on, it looks like that once the missile is locked (rear aspect, but also front aspect) and fired the missile will not lose track once the target turns head on: In conclusion: RedFor has missiles that can lock and track head-on and with superior manouverablity. BlueFor can't lock or track head-on and has superior speed and range. Look, if you like the server this way that's completely fine to me. I just think that everyone shuold be aware of the fact that and the current weapon restricion achive rear-aspect-only just for BlueFor. In my opinion the missions are unbalanced in favor of RedFor since max speed and max range is not really relevant for the typical engagments, not to mention 8 missiles vs 2, but anyone is free to differ. I'll also link the TacView files https://www.dropbox.com/s/xkn25ci6jeod83m/Missions.zip?dl=0 Interesting G-loads here, but this is more of a question to whomever has more info on G-limits and track-rate of this missile (R-60).

I didn't want to bother you much just for me (but and also out of curiosity), so I played around a bit with the texture and I now I get what you mean that the square is too small to give variety. In the end I opted for removing scratches all together since the problem, I guess not solvable by us, is the small size of the square and even reducing the scratches to let's say a single dot and small line will still keep the annoying repeating pattern. Bit of a shame :noexpression: Obliviously I'll keep the edit just for me, hope you don't mind. If you want add the clean version, well I'll leave that to you :)

Just amazing, finally up to date quality textures. Just a request if you're interested and doable anyway. Could you maybe try, to reduce the scratches (maybe and increasing the variety) on the cockpit? Currently it's like having a tight blanket of the same identical scratches that even makes it hard to spot.

It doesn't matter if it's a bug or not. The current state of the things is that MiG-21 and MiG-19 are able to get a lock on front aspect, while F-5 with AIM-9 P can't. If things in future changes, then the mission should adapt along side with the new state of things.

Hello, just a quick question. When restrictions are on, why are AIM-9P5 banned while R3-S and K-13A, able to lock in front aspect, are available? here's an example with the MiG-19 timestamp at 0:55

Hello, since patch 2.5.4.28461 Open Beta all instruments have some ugly static reflection of the cockpit. These were not present before and if they were, they were barley visible. Right now they just look like stains on the glasses. Also overall the cockpit textures looks worst with a more cartoonish look than before.

Hello, as title says the Radar grid brightness stopped working with patch 2.5.4.28461 Open Beta

Rather than fixing current bugs they are adding new ones. Ways to treat was is supposed to be a released module. Same issue here if wasn't clear.