Vosxod

Поставил 77.72 - посмотрим что будет ...

Атличный совет друг! :) Заодно и перееду на другую квартиру - вдруг поможет ... ;)

Перезагрузы продолжаются! :( Теперь с дровами 76.50 Причем не связанные похоже с присутствием авакса в миссии. Тока что играл на сервере - два полета нормально, третий - перезагруз! Все полеты делал с записью треков (Ctrl+R). Есть у меня одна мысля - я занимаюсь разработкой музыкального софта и в связи с этим у меня на компе стоит ogg кодек от MediaXW (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mediaxw). Graphedit именно через его DirectShow фильтер огг файлы пропускает. Может с этим связано? ЗЫ MediaXW с компа сносить не хочу - надо для работы! :)

I dont even feel it worth to talk to you anymore - there is nothing in this conversation that gives me any info/knowledge/pleasure...

Excuse me?!? Where exactly did I “trash” anyone?!? I questioned the statement that settings are full real! Yes, I don’t agree with that. But I never trashed people. You give me quote from my posts where I trash any person or shut up. I respect admins and whoever supports those servers so don’t try to dirty me! I NEVER called myself an expert. All I know that 1) 50% is ED opinion – and if anyone is expert here – these guys are! 2) Different documents and books show statistics that A2A missiles performance is not as great as it was advertised. And quotes from these documents were already posted.

Это голосование было задумано как часть такого же на английском форуме: http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=9772 Дело в том что тамошний народ утверждает (несмотря на все мои доводы и мнение ЕД) что мол "мы уже давно все обсудили и наши эксперты решили что надо ставить на 100%!". При этом во всех спорах они тыкают мне - что я мол один такой тупой, а их много. Ну вот я и решил выяснить сколько же приверженцов 100% установки... :)

Chill out! 1) I have responded your challenge. I said – we will meet and fight. My squad’s primary platform is IL2FB/PF – if you wanna fight in IL2 – we can meet on-line any day – just tell us a time! As for LO:FC – only 2 my squad members have considerable experience in it. 2 more are actively learning and more will probably come. However if you’d like to fight with just 2 of us – no problemo! Anyday! 2) Let me understand your twisted logic here – do you think that if you win in our on-line match it’s going to prove that 100% is true setting? What is this childish urge to prove your point in intellectual argument with “oh lets fight I’ll show ya!” 3) Where exactly “thing has been explained quite well from a variety of very learned people”? Links? Documents? Personal experience in real life combat with A2A missiles? So far you just hide behind some anonymous, very good pilots/experts unheard opinion. 4) After all what this poll and it’s second part on Russian forum: http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=9773 shows??? And finally we have disagreement in missile effectiveness setting. So? I respect your (personal) opinion - if you like to think so - fine! However my squad mates and me try to keep this argument in intelligent, polite manner – as intellectual people should. You however, instead of staying in constructive limits try to call us names and prove your point with brute force… This is not the way this community communicates. So stay focused on facts and stop going personal!

Cmon ppl! Vote more actively! In all my arguments it was "you (single) don’t know anything about missiles and we (note plural here!) have decided long time ago with even bigger group of excellent pilots that it has to be 100%" So where is that huge crowd of wizards??? :)

Wow :) 95% - huh? So you think 90% is too little and 100% is too much? ;)

I did not forget cause there are no servers with such setting, is there? :)

Ваше мнение: Какой уровень эффективности ракет в настройках сложности соответствует реалу?

Just select what YOU think.

http://www.609squadron.com/

I hoped that popularity will grow. At least to have several servers with constant attendance, more players your know? I dont think about BS'ing or not BS'ing really - you think about it if you like. I'm trying to call things what they are. If there seems to be a problem - I say - there is problem guys. You can call it whining if you like, call it whatever...

Well I think it wrong setting and I will use all opportunities to bring ppl attention to it. I like your server except this thing... About squad match - could be good idea! :) We have 4 609ners now flying LO and fifth supposed to join very soon. I, of course, the veteran is this group - I started LO about 1 year ago :) LOL! And finally about choice of server - believe you me I allways join different server in HL with realistic effect setting if there are at least 2-3 ppl on it. However 80% of the time all these servers are empty and there are some 5-6 players on S77 - so there is no choice ...

Whoa :) I got jumped! Nice repsonse time guys - maybe community is not dead after all... I do have pretty good idea, relax. Of course I realize missiles are much better in 80s than in late 60s... The question is how nuch better? What this has to do with GENERAL discussion about missile effectiveness in LO? I dont care whos got bigger "you know what" ... Now thats funny - after jumping me you agree to what I said :). However I bet you would not agree that active missiles are overmodeled as well.

Dude, you're in the wrong place! Seriously dude, you are lost... Disagree! When was it really booming?!? I was expecting HL players numbers to go up after FC came out, and I'm waiting and waiting. Before it was "oh not everyone got FC yet..." and now it's "oh everyone is on vacation now..." BS! I would agree to that. Because of luck of campaign in LO I have 2 choices basically: go play on 77th server with maxed missile effectiveness (doh ! :) ) or play some isolated missions offline which does not create 'the atmosphere'... Having multirole fighters on blue and red (Su33 with it's dumb bombs does not really do it! at least A2G antiradar munitions needed!) would make more options for mission creators and on-line setups. And guys who demand realism - what exactly do you want may I ask? More lethal missiles I'm guessing? Deadly AMRAAM? I'm reading your (american) author here - mr. Robert K. Wilkox "Scream of eagles" is the book name. From expert's report prepared for pentagon: This is about sparrow. And now compare to sparrow in LO! Missiles are far less lethal than you think...

Где работает? В воздухе - да, только это и работает. На земле - включает\выключает колесо. Я сам, лично пробовал - ну елы, палы, позови какого нить фальконщика, он тее все покажет... :)

Назначаеш кнопку джоя на "Wpn-Missile Hardpoints cycle" в настройках игры...

Очень просто! Дело в том что "функцией" является не "включить управление колесом" и не "переключить оружие" а "кнопка мизинца ХОТАС". Понимаеш? Таким образом в настройках игры я назначаю ОДНУ функцию, а уже сама игра знает что кнопка мизинца работает на земле как одно, а в режиме воздух-воздух другое. Ну посмотрите сами в F4AF - неужели в ЕД ниодной копии нету? :)

Так точно! Только что сам проверил!

Нет, не только для просто подсказки! Все реальные функции ХОТАС имеют аналоги в игре и работают так как написано на этих страницах. Я этими функциями пользуюсь, очень удобно! Пример: "TARGET MANAGEMENT SWITCH (TMS)" в игре клавиши Ctrl+Up, Ctrl+Left, Ctrl+Right, Ctrl+Down'

да вы шо ребята?!? я прямо щас имею в ЛО Ctrl и Win клавиши назначенные на кнопки джоя - в настройках игры это давным давно уже есть...

Отлично пацаны! Все понимаю, для помехи нельзя, но ЗАЧЕМ мне отрубать зрение для ДРУГИХ целей, которые возможно без помех ?!? ;)

Эээ, да почти все ХОТАС. Посмотри например мануал к Falcon 4: Allied Force стр 307 - 315...