hiuuz

Meanwhile I found it on military.com but it's low quality. I'm sure I saw it on higher resolution back then! https://www.military.com/video/aircraft/jet-fighters/f-15-eagles-live-fire-missile-training/2117220229001

Hi all! Many-many years ago I found a short video about F-15 dogfight and live firing training. It has a Rock n Roll track under it and some radio communications of the pilots. I can't find it anymore on the web, but found a bad quality version of it with an other background music. Here it is: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2k3wu Knows somebody this video or has a source for the original material?

@Ramsay Thanks the advice regards to Mavericks! Regards to the cue issue, I didn't roll back so long to recognize

I found, sometimes I fired a Laser maverick than the second Mav can't see the laser spot. Here is a video about firing 4 Mav. The first was without problem, but with the other three I had issues. I tried to switch the right MFD to the Mav screen to see it's caged/uncaged state. An other issue could be seen in this video: the Situational Awareness Cue of the TPOD acts wierd when TPOD looks behind the plane. You can see the designated target on the left MFD and where the SAC dot is on the right MFD.

Hi all! Have somebody looked after what type of pressure sensor (load cell) are the Realsimulator base using?

Oh man, I didn't think about the light conditions. I set the date to a full moon night and I got what I expected earlier! Thank you, and I apologize about my ignorance :)

On the runway is a M1A2 from aprox 20km. On the Mercury at night it's way to hard to find it! On the video from DCS 1.5 the ground textures is much lighter so you can identify the airfield easier. ${1}

Hi! The Mercury LLTV is way to dark, nearly useless. In daylight conditions gives normal image. In 1.5 was no problem. Has anybody the same problem?

Hi! At the weekend I ceand up my my system drive (250Gb) SSD, and gave a try to 2.5 and I'm suprised! I was worried about my GTX950 because in 1.5 (high details) at the first mission of Su25T campaign, I had bad FPS average with big framerate drops. I thought maybe the 2Gb video ram is the cause. In 2.5 I set the graphics to medium and in 1080p, I have 30-40 FPS average even in the first campaign mission! Maybe 2.5 are more optimized, so I'm happy with that! My eyes get used to the 2000's graphics so even in medium it looks good :)

Thank you the answer! At the moment this is not a problem. Important thing is that if I buy FC3, I didn't throw out the money on the window. Later if I hooked on enough and decide to upgrade my system than move to 2.5. But if I stay at the "flying one-two hour a week" level, than 1.5 with FC3 will be more than enough for me and the money what I pay for FC3 not going to waste.

Hi! I'm new to DCS, though once I played Flanker 2.5 a lot. I'm not a hardcore player, but sims always had a small corner in my heart. Lately I have tried a few still availabe sims and when I came to DCS I immediately knew that "I'm at home"! I was a big gamer around 1998-2005 but now I have only a mid range system (AMD FX-8320, GTX 950, 16GB ddr3), so I decided to start with the still availabe DCS World 1.5. Flying around with the Su25, high specs, 1080p on a single monitor, 40-60 fps, for me it's enough and the game is still beautiful! I decided to buy Flaming Cliffs 3 for the basic planes, but I'm confused with version compatibility: 1, Can I buy FC3 and use all of the contents with 1.5.8? From the 1.5 main menu it is accesible. 2, I saw by the "MIG-29 for DCS World" got an update and now requires 2.5.3, but says this plane is included in FC3. Means this that MIG-29 is not accessible in 1.5 anymore even if I buy FC3?