Grisleybear

I was that 29, that 21 really wanted me dead :D Think we lost another 29 to friendly fire as well last night.

Sorry to bump but was this ever looked into? ED updated the dispersion for the guns on the F18 + F16 a few months back. Will we see any changes to the F5 or is what we have right now accurate? Thanks, EDIT Took a look at the shell_table.lau that was mentioned earlier in this thread. Seems like ED changed the Da0 value of the M61 from 0.0022 to 0.0015. However, the Da0 value of the M39 is still set as 0.0022.

Any chance we can add the GBU 12 to the F5? If nothing more it will be a fun little distraction to use, it requires teamwork and coordination to employ as well (f5 has no lasing capability so will require a buddy on the ground to lase targets).

Server seems to have crashed? Two towns was just about to finish i think.

Still present.

So, from a red point of a view, would you say that the rb24j is too good? Using it recently, it is difficult to get a tone, even from the rear, but once I do, the results have been pretty great, apart from when the migs use flares or pull high g, which is to be expected. I think things are pretty balanced right now, both teams only have access to rear aspect missiles, no AIM9M at all which i agree is a good choice, i don't really see what can be changed to make things better for both teams.

"The R-13M is a much improved version of the R-3S and has capabilities similar to the AIM-9G Sidewinder. The R-13M is still a tail engagement missile only but is far more capable than the R-3S due to its new seeker and rocket motor. The new cooled seeker is more accurate and somewhat more resistant to countermeasures. The new rocket motor burns longer The redesigned body makes the R-13M more maneuverable. The system is known as R-13M and the NATO designation is AA-2D Advanced Atoll. The designation AA-2-2 is sometimes used as well. R-13M: Original version introduced in 1974. R-13M1: Improved R-13M with new forward fins introduced in 1976." https://old.weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/HH07%20-%20AA-2%20Atoll.html Unless this is fake propaganda?

But.. but.. but.... the A10 is too good! It constantly hunts down 21s and goes for a2a kills with its magical missiles!!! I am being sarcastic obviously... But, look at the clip above.... if a 21 jumps two A10s like that and gets killed, i see nothing wrong with the A10.... more with the 21 pilot... The A10 was trying to do the mission on the server (attacking objectives). It just got bounced on the way by a pesky 21 who tried to attack with guns and got lazy, so obviously it struck back... This is what i don't get... You want the A10 to have no missiles at all? So it can be completely defenceless as the 21's circle it and pounce on it at will...??? I am sure many F5 pilots have been shot down by the SU25 and its R60M... But i don't see any complaints on this forum??? Correct me if i am wrong!

So what you are saying is that i could make a baseless, under researched (and probably wrong) remark and have it impact the server, either for better or for worse. I think everyone needs to take a step back and realise how lucky we are to even have this sort of server and setup in the first place. If we are going to keep on changing this and that, this and that, we will go around in circles. I remember going to rear aspect only a year or so ago, it was great fun, however, the A10 still had access to the aim9p ( cant remove it otherwise f5 will be left with just gar-8 ). This meant that the SU25 did not have any air to air defence whilst the A10 did... Obviously this lead to people moaning that the SU25 was useless because it couldn't defend itself and such stuff was reverted and we were back at square one. Do you see where i am going with this?

Are there really that many Viggen pilots that take out the mav as an air to air weapon?...... is that the reason it was removed?

Also, what will this mean for the missions where you can activate Mig 29/ Mirage What load-outs will they be able to choose from?

I get that the harrier has fancy electronics, rwr, etc.. But why remove it from missions when the proper variant is not in place yet. It now has no a2a, no SEAD capability, just bombs and rockets... I see no problem in keeping it around until the proper harrier shows up, then it can be removed.

Looks like the Scud has been added in the latest update!! Might be cool to see it in some missions.

Also, will the Pucará and Kiowa be added in future? If the modules are in a good state on release of course. Thanks,

Server not showing up? Does it need updating to latest open beta version, they released a patch today i think.