Varioss

Those are already in game for long time, the NS430 can use them. Here a point in game and the corresponding in real life https://opennav.com/waypoint/RU/NIRGA. Unfortunatly I can't find anywhere what AIRAC cycle it uses so I assume it's outdated by many years.

Surprised no one made a wish list post for this variant yet so here it goes. The MF2000 is the ultimate variant of F1, which would make it on-par and even superior to the M2K we have in game. The upgrade program took place almost 20 years ago and since Moroccan army is looking to replace it's fleet soon with F-16 block 72/F-35 we could expect some more information/manuals about the plane to pop-up soon. This is not an suggestion to add right now but rather what we could get as a some kind of mid-life update after the modules comes out of EA. More information on the variant:https://www.timesaerospace.aero/news/defence/mirage-upgrade-augments-new-fighter-force

Did you ever try to make george hover in any combat load configuration + in a mountains? No matter how careful you are with the altitude changes he will pitch up too much when transiting from 40 tas to 0 tas, and in doing so he will put the heli in vrs.

Not sure what you are talking about, they work fine. Here you can see george going to hover mode, puts it in vrs and kills us. George can't VRS 2.trk

In the peak hours all the popular servers are full all the time and getting in is incredibly hard, we should have the option to just refresh the player count of currently selected server instead of having to refresh all the servers.

What are you even on about? This is not an competition. I assure you nobody cares that you can ARR. Why are you turning everything into a dick measuring contest to show how better you are then everybody else? Again, superiority complex much?

And some people are stuck in the past refusing to let go of outdated ways of thinking. shrug

Yes that's what I mean. Everybody should play like they want. I can feel a lot of servers will turn that option off and it won't change anything.

No it won't affect it. A engineer responsible for vulkan won't be assigned to do automatic ARR. A person responsible for the core mechanics is gonna do that. It's clear you have no idea how software development works. I sure hope it's gonna get implemented without the ability to block it so people like you will complain more.

When did I say I can't ARR? I support people that won't learn it and don't have the means to learn it. And yes I will call out people who's opinions are just plain wrong and limits other to what they themselves think is the "right way to do X".

No you still don't understand the core issue. We know how to learn ARR it's just some people don't have the time to put in or they can't even do that.

Well it's clear you are stuck in past century when nobody thought about accessibility. Why do you hate others so much as to limit what they can do? Why can't you just ignore this thread never turn the option on and live on?

It’s literally a game. It’s not important, you are larping. On what basis do you say that? Do you have data saying “only 0,5% of players play on keyboard?" Dcs allows it so why shouldn’t it be considered. Wow, and? It’s not real life it’s a video game, no differences between war thunder. There is a simulator mode and arcade mode and for some reason the users are not complying? It is a elitsm and I have no idea why you think it’s not… No wait you are from military it all makes sense kek, It’s always the military people complaining about giving everybody fair chance. Superiority complex much?

The skill you provided are actually useful real life skills not an skill in video game. Don't compare 2 different things. Most servers are like that already so it won't change anything.

Every time a thread like this appear it goes like this: The author thinks that he has a great idea that would improve the game accessibility. Then the larpers come and say stuff like "In real life you don't have any assists" or I disagree completely, all modern games try to be as accessible as possible and dcs has no features like that. Some people can't just spend so much time to polish one small skill. And there is tons of valid reasons like lack of time or health conditions. Whether it's ADHD or an illnesses that limit our motor skills like Parkinson.In a previous thread regarding this topic somebody used the argument of "There is no disabled people in military and they shouldn't play dcs either" kinda funny since Wags is working in ED. What about people flying on keyboard and game pads? Not everybody has full simpits with virpils and other expensive gear. A lot of people fly with simple sticks that lack the precision to refuel. I personally don't care about following procedures in dcs, I land straight in without doing patterns nor fly the ball correctly. Does it affect you all? No. So how would automatic ARR destroy your fun? It's ridiculous. The argument of "It would take ED too much time and would slow down the development". Do you really think this lowly of ED that a simple feature like that would cause other features to be delayed in any meaningful way? Let's look at an example: We are on a public server with 1 tanker. Somebody is "trying" to refuel but he isn't that proficient and it takes him long time to hook up and even if he succeeds he gets disconnected soon. There is a person waiting to refuel but he can't, he is pissed and if he is unlucky enough he runs out of fuel and crashes. Let's assume the worst case he crashes into the tanker and nobody can refuel for some time and everybody is pissed. Now with the automatic refuelling, he gets near tanker, he instantly gets hooked up refuels and is gone in 2-3 minutes and everybody is happy. Do you know he has auto AAR? No you don't. It increases everybody's fun in multiplayer environment. I am sure this is a case of silent majority, the loud ones are the one that sit on forum 24/7 and complain about every feature. While the majority of DCS doesn't use forums, and probably would use this feature. I really hope NineLine or BigNewy will finally notice that we need features like that and pass it to the developers.

Is there any possibilities for devs to move the autostart sequence from .dll files to .lua like in newer modules ex. Mirage F1? I would love to optimize the AutoStart since the current one is way too long.

My man single-handedly destroyed the Soviet Air Force by saying they are not real pilots since they used the r-60. Even if it’s gonna miss it would overpressure non-armoured target like that since it seems it would hit closely. You literally have a picture of sidewinder doing it but you still put finger into your ears and go “LaLaLa I am not listening to you, missiles can’t do it”. Every post I made on this forum turns into a <profanity>storm… I think I will post some more

Do you actually have problems with reading?? It's "Military and Aviation" Sub-Forum. I don't care about how it's simulated in DCS neither do I care about the technical side of the missile. I asked about "REAL LIFE USAGE OF IT" and sources for it. Also Wags literally said they are gonna add that functionality later in the Early Access of the Hind. I have never met more insane person on an internet forum. Re-read the entire thread and if you still think you are right then just don't answer anymore. (Or do answer as I have a great laugh reading the bs you write :D)

I have never said anything about tanks... I said ground targets. And second I asked for a source about a known usage of the missile. So if you won't post any you can just stop posting anything. You won't help anybody with your bs explanations.

It's quite incredible, I've never seen a person that thinks they know so much when in reality then know nothing. You have 4.6k posts + your account is 18 years so you'd assume you read quite a bit about different technologies but no... You just spew lies. I wish the mods would filter out messages like that to avoid confusing new members not that knowledgeable in the topic

I went in game and found out 2 things: The tooltip. It's seems to indeed be a switch to specify the ground targets and not that the aircraft is in the air After setting it to GND position I could still lock on target and fire so it's 100% not some kind of safety/caging switch. I feel like there is no difference in the fuzing in 2 modes. Maybe it's something that's not yet implemented.

Even if you need people to SCREAM to you irl due to your deafness that comes with your age you don't need to do that in the internet. Also it seems soviet's r-60s were decades ahead of it's times with that "shape locking" and only AIM-9X caught up to it... I wonder why they replaced it with r-73 if it was so ahed of it's times... I looked further a bit and it indeed may be to cage the seeker on the ground. Shame there seems to be 0 sources backing that capabilities up.

I did not ask if you "think" it's possible. It is possible and I asked for sources for that. If you aren't 100% sure about something maybe it would be the best if you didn't respond at all. I assumed since there is a "ground" switch in the Mi-24 there could be some mention in the manuals about what it does. I am also looking for other sources like magazines that may talked about it.

This is just wrong. Not sure what you mean by "Stinger missile", it's an russian missile that predates the stinger. But R-60 has an Infrared seeker it doesn't matter if the target is a ground vehicle or an aircraft. If it sees a heat-signature you can shoot at it. Mi-24 even has ground option on the A2A panel.

Hello, I am looking for any kind of manuals, books, videos or any other source (preferably official soviet ones) that talks about usage of R-60/R-60M missiles on Mi-24 (or other soviet airplanes/helicopters) against ground targets. Sources in russians are okay. Thanks for all responses.