The problem with your poll is that those that are selecting the I'm happy I have had no problems are the ones that are not having to do another re-install for what ever reason, would they be ticking the same if they found they had to re-install and kiss good by to one or more activation tickets?
I don't understand how this problem could have got passed either ED or SF surely part of their testing involved multiple installs on the same machine to check the quality of the protection, which leads me to believe that this problem was known about before the product was released for download, even if they say a last minuet change to the software or protection is responsible for the error why wasn't it re-tested prior to release?
I have held off from buying FC simply because I thought there may have been some problems (because ED are newbies at selling stuff) and SF do not have a good rep as a stable copy protection system, plus ED have chosen to ignore repeated requests for an official announcement on what is the procedure for anyone who has purchased FC and used all their activation tickets, they should have been able to answer that on the first post asking the question, because they have got to have planned for this type of situation as part of the decision making on what type of copy protection they would be using, because SF would need to build in the ability to add extra tickets to the end user, so why have they stalled in answering what is a very important question from the end users?